Most scientists deny the biblical flood because they claim there is no evidence that water flooded the earth even though over 200 ancient cultures have passed along accounts of a global flood where one family survived.
Yet this is what scientists claim happened in the Jurassic period:
"The Jurassic geological record is good in western Europe, where extensive marine sequences indicate a time when much of the continent was submerged under shallow tropical seas; famous locales include the Jurassic Coast World Heritage Site and the renowned late Jurassic lagerstätten of Holzmaden and Solnhofen.[6] In contrast, the North American Jurassic record is the poorest of the Mesozoic, with few outcrops at the surface.[7] Though the epicontinental Sundance Sea left marine deposits in parts of the northern plains of the United States and Canada during the late Jurassic, most exposed sediments from this period are continental, such as the alluvial deposits of the Morrison Formation."
So they know there is much evidence of a global flood yet deny the biblical account because it's in the bible. Instead, they make up stories of an ice age that no one in history has recounted. That's no different than looking at a forest and imagining that trees once covered the whole earth. :bugeye: So why is the imagination considered evidence in science? :shrug:
Yet this is what scientists claim happened in the Jurassic period:
"The Jurassic geological record is good in western Europe, where extensive marine sequences indicate a time when much of the continent was submerged under shallow tropical seas; famous locales include the Jurassic Coast World Heritage Site and the renowned late Jurassic lagerstätten of Holzmaden and Solnhofen.[6] In contrast, the North American Jurassic record is the poorest of the Mesozoic, with few outcrops at the surface.[7] Though the epicontinental Sundance Sea left marine deposits in parts of the northern plains of the United States and Canada during the late Jurassic, most exposed sediments from this period are continental, such as the alluvial deposits of the Morrison Formation."
So they know there is much evidence of a global flood yet deny the biblical account because it's in the bible. Instead, they make up stories of an ice age that no one in history has recounted. That's no different than looking at a forest and imagining that trees once covered the whole earth. :bugeye: So why is the imagination considered evidence in science? :shrug: