I neither said or implied that the link in question was representative of American Christianity. And I have never said or implied it in any discussion on Sciforums.
Post #3 (your first): you state that THE religion in America is an American religion, that it is a style that has been manufactured in America, for Americans.
Accepting that you are limiting the discussion to just Christianity, your comments are a gross generalisation and offensive to all those Americans that do not follow what you deem to be an "American religion".
But you clearly generalise within this post that Christians within America follow what you deem to be "an American religion".
Post #15 (your second): You state that "
We can distinguish, with relative ease, the difference between The American Christianity, and The European form of Christianity. Perhaps it's that you can't." and you follow that immediately with two youtube clips, one of stereotypical evangelic preachers and the other of a more sombre form, actually an Easter service from Mexico.
The implication is inescapable that you were linking "The American Christianity" to the former, and "The European form of Christianity" to the latter.
Since you have previously generalised that The American Christianity is the form followed by Christians in America, this thus exacerbated your offensive position by effectively generalising all Christians in America as following the style espoused by the evangelic preachers.
Post #22: You post a further video to make the point that the style you deem to be "The American Christianity" is not found anywhere else, which is patently wrong, as already noted to you.
Thus you continue your offensiveness.
Then you claim that Catholicism is a European religion, as if this excuses you from considering Catholics in America in your responses.
i.e. you are generalising and in doing so being offensive to those people.
It really should be obvious to you that you were generalising, and being offensive by doing so.
Subsequently it is simply a matter of you trying to argue your way out of the obvious - thus destroying the discussion.
Plus I have since explained that both Vids were extreme cases.
Only after the offensiveness of your generalisation had been pointed out to you.
It neither excuses nor explains away those generalisations, nor the offense but rather simply explains why that generalisation is offensive.
Why would you think that referencing an extreme as being the generalisation of American Christians would not be offensive?
Your incessant accusations are therefore wilfully untrue.
It is a pity you think that.
I would have thought that pointing out that you were being offensive would have led to you recognising it and simply apologising.
But you have gone the alternate route of denying and trying to counter with accusations of your own.
What a pity.
I haven't dragged this thread to the cesspool. I responded to OP. You're the one who has decided to take it down this route.
Then simply apologise for being offensive with your generalisation and we can move on.