Wow. You are super confused on so many levels.
You are probably right. A second check showed the price of your junk paper runs for 69 bucks.
You should have read the thread.
Once I saw the moronic OP I had no desire to wade through it. But I did give you a fair chance to state your rationale for jumping from economics to thermo and you refused to do so. After that, it became apparent you are just here to peddle junk paper.
Speaking of Benny Hill, you don't know how to construct an argument.
Speaking of Benny Hill, the disconnect between "Benny Hill" and "argument" is analogous to your pseudo thesis: there is no connection between economic modelling and thermo.
Really?
It may be that you already erased the empirical evidence that you are in all probability the same damn fool. Because when I first went to check on this person you claim to cite (without giving any links, or any credible evidence as to BW Hill's credentials) I happened to notice that on one of the web pages, BW Hill is described as having a Master's Degree in Mining & Manufacturing Engineering, which (correct me if I am wrong) so far only connects to you (i.e., no other evidence has been entered into the record to lead us to any other conclusion). Pretty damning indeed.
So
to hell with full disclosure? If you were not guilty of this you would have no reason to be defensive. No matter, the fraud is obvious enough in the huge technical blunder you have made.
Maybe not. But if you were, you would have to deny it. No matter, your nonsense is "of the school of wellwisher" which is even worse. (Believing we solve problems like wellwisher does is worse than wellwisher believing he's right)
Even if I were, at least I am not selling it here on this board.
The Etp model is a thermodynamic model of the life cycle of the oil production process. It is not an economic model.
Really? So you are not making any claims about
the cost of production?
You have lost the bet!
I am not a dirty rotten liar or a fraud. You, sir, owe me an apology.
I owe you nothing. You owe the readers a sincere basis for intelligent discussion. This is just a venue for you to bicker, peddle junk, and possibly more heinous stuff.
Short answer: You are a troll.
Even if that were true, at least I am not guilty of posting the OP and the crap at the so-called Hill's Group.
Longer answer: This is an amazing act of professional tag team wrestling desperation. No one can put forth a decent argument against the Etp model. So they send in the clown. This forum is a joke.
Bullshit. There is no such thing as an Etp model. You are taking some very old concepts (peak oil, the IEA - formed during oil crisis of the early 70s) and stuffing them into the moronic claim that everything they were talking about then fits under the umbrella of a few formulas from thermo.
This is why you I say you are establishing yourself as a liar.
The only question that remains is this - what is this supposed to mean:
A reserve status report
Report# HC3 - 433
???
Because this is the mark of a fraudster - assigning fake names and numbers to trash not even properly called "a report". Report to who? Nobody? Funded by who? Probably nobody, except no wonder if some energy related company is paying you something anyway. Referenced by who? Nobody. Published where? Nowhere. Endorsed where? Nowhere. No academic or industrial entity would dare damage its reputation by giving any credibility to this.
Warning, folks - we are dealing with imposters.
by Numbersman » Tue 18 Nov 2014, 21:08:19