It seems to me that your version of "God did it" is "the universe is eternal".
No no no.
There is no god in my universe so dont try and sneak one in...you are welcome to visit but please leave your imaginary friends at home.
Now I can't prove either of them wrong
Well you can get close to proving god does not exist.
In courts of law the level of proof for criminal matters is "beyond a reasonable doubt" and for civil matters " what a reasonable man would conclude"...now if you applied either of those proofs you would succeed easily in proving there is no god.
If you applied the same proofs to the eternal universe clearly it would be proved.
Science tends to show religious notions are incorrect...evolution, the sequence of the evolution of the universe even a description of the end of the Earth in relevations has stars falling on the ground...clearly that is so wrong it does not need further explanation.
And we can make a list of the things science shows religion is just wrong...oh can we make a list.
mainstream science believes that the universe is expanding, which means it had a start.
Sure its expanding but that does not point to a start just because thats what you want to believe.
We can observe a lump of bread dough expand and conclude the bread had a start but that observation does not entitlement us to ignore the fact that the dough was made from something...this is the part folk seem to miss...you cant make something out of nothing...science tells us the universe is expanding but that does not imply a start unless you extrapolate to a pre determined condition...
The initial Big Bang drew upon observations of expansion to conclude that the universe started at a point but much later had to in effect disregard that observation to instal an intial inflation period which in effect rendered the prior observed expansion meaningless. ..it ended up being something irrelevant to the later adjustent of the theory.
The initial observation and conclusion was in effect very flawed.
And it was then that the idea that as it was expanding must point to a start was first presented.
But if that expansion was reverse engineered the extrapolation could not remotely get you back to a start...it was only when the theory of inflation was concocted that became possible...and frankly that theory is a stretch. ..it asks us to accept that the initial evolution saw the universe grow from the size of a grape fruit to at least the size of the observable universe in a zillionth of a zillionth of a zillionth of a second...that needs fixing in my view...but even so it ztill works from there being something... . At what point can we detect a start? Well we cant...even speculation of what came before the big bang works with something...a quantum foam is often run out. ..but something.
I don't know how it started,
You assume it started ...you dont know that it did start.
This is an expression that merely recognises that the equations can not tell us anything at that point...the equation has passed the point where it can describe reality....you may as well say...here be dragons and beasts at the edge of the world.
As I have said in another thread.
Why reach for the notion of a god when such has no basis other than myth...
You dont entertain fire breathing draggons or aliens who eat humans so why leave the most unbelievable myth of all on the table...god is made up and a lie...you have heard that if you tell a lie often enough some fool will believe it...well the god lie is about the best example of such.
Ask what was the first alledged contact with this God...mmm...one mans word it seems...next...next...next...
you can look and look but nothing other than the say so of just a few people..and heresay...there is a good reason heresay is not considered reasonae evidence in court...it is useless. ...and this is the foundation?... heck you have more reports of aliens yet they are dismissed...I dont believe in visiting aliens but at least there is a huge pile of evidence to sort thru...so as I said why leave a less than credible myth on the table....to do so just means the lie is starting to find a home in your head.
I can say that, without, like you, keeping the door open to the myth I want to believe.
I dont know for sure the universe is eternal but it seems the most reasonable idea given we can accept something just does not come from nothing...that is what all our experience and observation tells us...there is no evidence of something coming from nothing...in fact there is no evidence for nothing...so how can the universe be anything other than eternal.
delusional to say you do.
Yes it would be but I say that finally I dont really know. .. but I have a most reasonable basis to draw the conclusion that the universe is eternal.
..delussion would be to ignore the science of evolution in favour of bronze age notions as to creation. ..delusion would be believing that a creator is needed to create a universe just for humans...delusion would be thinking humans were created to look like a mythical creator...I could go on but thinking the universe is eternal and that something cant come from nothing is hardley delusional.
Alex