There's an answer
I was trying to be polite, you sick, selfish excuse for a human being. Jesus, it sounds like a Belushi cartoon I saw on the web: "If it was down to drinking my piss, or drinking the camel's piss, which would you do?" Talk about a winning choice.
Let me try throwing another question at you, just for demonstration:
If you've read James Joyce's
Portrait of an Artist as a Young Man, I'm sure you'll recall a graphic explanation of hell. Key for our purposes today is that you never get used to the torment, can never become accustomed to the regularity of your agonies.
So you arrive in Hell, and you are welcomed; there is a labor shortage and your hand is needed to torment the unrighteous. They build no memory, merely a sensation of fear. They bear no scars, else sensation would be lost. Each time you torture, it is like the first time for the unfortunate. What would you do? Or, specifically, what woudn't you do?
Now we can make that last question more specific.
Would you--
- Sexually torture a child? (Rhetorical--I don't want to know these answers, all things considered.)
- Flay the skin from your still-living mother?
- (Invent a torture here, I'm sure you're proficient)
The point being is that I can corner you into considering almost any number of evils, and if we hold to the restrictions of the question, the one answer you can't give is "No, it's repugnant." Why? Because this is
Hell we're talking about.
Would you get up each day and torture a child first thing? What if your refusal would land you on the other end of the torture?
Hypothetical conditions can be postulated which would cause any person to buckle, except those who don't think so obsessively of themselves. It's all a matter of what's important to people.
:m:,
Tiassa