To a very large extent, yes. This is one of the reasons that I personally am an atheist, so it would be perfectly accurate to accuse me of having an "emotional" investment in remaining an atheist. It is very much my comfort zone. If you were a Christian or affiliated with a different religion from Christianity, you would start convincing me to change my opinions by trying to interest me in venturing outside my comfort zone.
In a way, this list can function as an instruction manual for a religious person who wants to affect a change in my beliefs without the discussion resulting in hurt feelings or ill-will on either side. I do not not mind people who are interested in persuading me to convert to their religious beliefs. In fact, I find it flattering in a way. When I meet one of those Christians who really mean well for me, I may not change the way I believe, but I almost always feel good about my experience with that person. If that kind of person came back to me the next day and said, "hey, why don't you visit my church with me next morning?" I have to admit, based on many proofs of this theory, that I would be very tempted to go along. If there were more Christians in the world who made that kind of impression on me, we would not be having this conversation. I would probably be attending Church every Sunday, and I would have better things to do than muck around on these forums. The list isn't intended to persuade anybody. It's intended to represent ME.
If I started quoting philosophers and trying to concoct persuasive arguments, I would be lying to myself and about myself, and that goes strongly against my values.
Arguably, yes. The majority of atheists, in the United States of America, I suspect that most people who identify as "atheist" are effectively "aChristian." I do not interact with Hindus, for example, nearly often enough that I can say, in all due honesty, that I have unequivocally concluded that Hinduism is a false religion. It is not really to my credit that I do not know more about it.
This was not intended as an argument. It was intended to represent my reasons for being an atheist. Part of the reason that I am so adamant in being an atheist is due to my encounters with "theists," most of which have been remarkably unpleasant. I find them to be a highly revolting group of people, and I feel that these are people who are simply born morally defective. Their very existence is an argument for abortion because theists, my friend, have gone quite a long way in challenging my faith in humanity. Interacting with a self-described "theist" can even result in me suffering from thoughts of suicide. I honestly hate them, and my hatred for people who fit into this category is one of my motivations for being an atheist. Christianity and other religions are going to continue to shrink until these asinine people simply shut the fuck up.
Indeed. Many religious people report that religious observation results in a reduction in their stress levels, and many people worldwide value spirituality and their interactions with their faith community for controlling their day-to-day stress. Because my stress levels are naturally a lot lower than those of most people, this is not something that would motivate me to assume an interest in religion or spirituality.
And I am afraid that I have never had any such experiences, and I am not really sure how far to trust other people's interpretations of their own experiences.
Well, it's about time somebody recognized it! It's an answer to the so-called "Pascal's Wager" that most people don't actually think of. Most people don't really have the imagination to contemplate a hypothetical deity that considers atheists to be his Elect.
Precisely. When I state my incredulity when someone says, "I had a religious experience," I am not trying to deride that person's judgement or honesty. Not intentionally, anyway. I am simply familiar with a number of alternative explanations for them that fit more neatly into my simple, limited understanding of the world around me.
I know. I really just wanted to make it a round number, and it kind of flopped. However, I do tend to find it very suspicious when a religious person says, "Well, you have to take the leap of faith first, and then you'll get your proof." At that point, they sound a lot like a drug-pusher.
Well, if I don't feel like I'm dealing with pusher scum, I tend to find their concern for me to be very charming.
One of the reasons that I don't discuss my atheism much anymore is that, lately, I find myself getting along very well with religious people, and I tend to be a lot more sporting than I used to be.