Sylwester's 'Everlasting theory'

Sylwester Kornowski said:
The new LHC data suggest that the supersymmetry is probably wrong i.e. the s-particles are not in existence.
Click to expand...
No, it doesn't. It excludes a particular energy range for SUSY particles. SUSY can exist at higher energies. Learn a little bit before opening your mouth.

Oh and I can't help but notice how you ignored the new data is showing strong evidence for the Higgs. Not consistent with your claims.
 
AlphaNumeric, as usual your posts are scandalous and you show that you do not understand the text you are reading. I see also that you have no time to read the hundreds articles in the newspapers concerning the actual data obtained in the LHC experiments.

In my last post there is the word “probably” and I cited the professor. There is tens of statements of scientists that probably the supersymmetry is incorrect i.e. that there are not in existence the s-particles. My theory shows that there is in existence the boson-fermion symmetry but origin of it differs very much from the described within the mainstream theory.

The TODAY status of the experimental data is as follows:
1. There are in existence the superluminal neutrinos
2. There are not in existence the Higgs bosons
3. There are not in existence the s-particles defined by the mainstream theories
4. No one graviton was detected
And my Everlasting Theory says that it will be forever.

The very weak signal of existence of the Type Z boson carrying the MEAN mass (this is not the central value) equal to 126 GeV was DETECTED in the SLD experiment (Stanford Large Detector). My atom-like structure of baryons leads to the mean value equal to 127 GeV. This is not the Higgs boson. Do you remember the rumor which appeared a few months ago that there was detected the Higgs boson carrying mass about 140 GeV? And what? The same will be with the particle carrying the mass in approximation 125 GeV.

AlphaNumeric, you reject the all experimental data obtained in the many experiments which are inconsistent with the mainstream theories. This is wrong policy. Did you hear that the young physicists in the CERN rose in revolt because many of the new experimental data show that the Standard Model is partially incorrect? You know, just my Everlasting Theory is the lacking part of the ultimate theory. I claim that in January 2012 there will appear information that the particle carrying the mass 125 GeV is not a Higgs boson. Just it is the weak signal of the Z Type particle.

There are three methods to calculate the superluminal speeds of neutrinos. All the methods lead to conclusion that the SUPERLUMINAL neutrinos are the NON-RELATIVISTIC particles and it is consistent with my Everlasting Theory.
 
Sylwester Kornowski said:
In my last post there is the word “probably”....

....

The TODAY status of the experimental data is as follows:
1. There are in existence the superluminal neutrinos
2. There are not in existence the Higgs bosons
3. There are not in existence the s-particles defined by the mainstream theories
4. No one graviton was detected
And my Everlasting Theory says that it will be forever.
Click to expand...
Strange how you dropped the 'probably' immediately after when listing the status of experimental data. At the very least you should be saying "There is no evidence for....", which is a long way away from saying "There are no ....". There's no evidence for life elsewhere in the universe but that's quite different from saying "There's no life elsewhere in the universe".

You're misrepresenting the experimental data, which is dishonest.
 
AlphaNumeric said:
Strange how you dropped the 'probably' immediately after when listing the status of experimental data. At the very least you should be saying "There is no evidence for....", which is a long way away from saying "There are no ....". There's no evidence for life elsewhere in the universe but that's quite different from saying "There's no life elsewhere in the universe".

You're misrepresenting the experimental data, which is dishonest.
Click to expand...

O.K. You know, your English is better.

The TODAY status of the experimental data is as follows:
1. There are in existence the superluminal neutrinos
2. There is no evidence for the Higgs boson(s)
3. There is no evidence for the s-particles defined by the mainstream theories
4. No one graviton was detected
And my Everlasting Theory says that it will be forever.

AlphaNumeric,
Should I explain how the masses (not other properties) of the quarks (they are the sham quarks) follow from my Everlasting Theory?
Should I explain the origin of the symmetries mentioned in my previous post?
Should I show how we can calculate the superluminal speeds of neutrinos applying three different physical quantities?
You know, I try not to be importunate.
You know, there is the physics beyond the mainstream theories. The last experimental data show that this is true. In my opinion, we will unable to solve the unsolved problems without my theory. We must PARTIALLY reformulate the SM so the QCD also. Can we discuss it without emotions, just pure physics and mathematics?
 
Sylwester Kornowski said:
Can we discuss it without emotions, just pure physics and mathematics?
Click to expand...
The problem is you cannot provide those when I've asked.

You cannot construct string theory from your work so your claims to have explained it are unjustified. I asked you many times to provide that mathematics and you can't. Your abuse of terminology, such as using a different meaning from the mainstream for 'effective theory', also means rational discourse is hindered.

You've had your chance Sylwester, you couldn't step up when challenged. Until you can provide those things I see no reason to further humour you. If you're unable to provide those things discussing such unjustified claims with you only serves to give the false impression your engaged in honest discussion. I don't wish it to seem to the casual lay-reader that your claims are worth lengthy discussion. As such if you can't provide said justification I'm not going to discuss your claims with you.
 
AlphaNumeric,
Many great scientists tried for decades to describe gravity and quantum physics within one homogenous description leading to the experimental data. We know that today such description is not in existence. Do you know why? I know. Scientists do not understand the ORIGIN of gravity and quantum physics. My Everlasting Theory shows that today (i.e. in the present stage of our Universe) gravity is CLASSICAL so we cannot describe these two theories applying the same terminology and applying the same methods. Do you understand such simple statement? The same is with my theory. In my theory appear the tachyons and the superluminal closed strings and neutrinos. Moreover, the three last particles are the NON-RELATIVISTIC particles. This means that I MUST apply different methods (so also terminology) than in the GR and QFT. The foundations of the string/M theory are associated with my theory i.e. with the lacking part of the ultimate theory so methods and terminologies are different but they lead to the initial conditions applied in the mainstream theories.

This post is the last my attempt to teach you the obvious truths. I will not try to do it again because it is useless. I am certain that all on this forum understand my position, only you cannot.
 
My theory shows that the neutrinos are simultaneously the superluminal and non-relativistic particles. They can be entangled and they communicate with superluminal speed. The experimental data suggest the same because such properties of the neutrinos lead to the experimental data (see my theory of neutrinos).

Such properties of the neutrinos show that we cannot describe their behaviour within the GR or QP or within the useless today string/M theory (my theory shows how foundations of the string/M theory should look to be useful). Just the initial conditions applied in these theories (so the applied methods also) are useless to describe the simultaneously superluminal and non-relativistic neutrinos.

We can see that we need new theory to formulate the theory of neutrinos correctly. Just we need new methods and my Everlasting Theory describes the new methods.
 
Sylwester Kornowski said:
My theory shows that the neutrinos are simultaneously the superluminal and non-relativistic particles. They can be entangled and they communicate with superluminal speed. The experimental data suggest the same because such properties of the neutrinos lead to the experimental data (see my theory of neutrinos).

Such properties of the neutrinos show that we cannot describe their behaviour within the GR or QP or within the useless today string/M theory (my theory shows how foundations of the string/M theory should look to be useful). Just the initial conditions applied in these theories (so the applied methods also) are useless to describe the simultaneously superluminal and non-relativistic neutrinos.

We can see that we need new theory to formulate the theory of neutrinos correctly. Just we need new methods and my Everlasting Theory describes the new methods.
Click to expand...
Did you have a website where you have detailed your theory?
 
From the posts #116 and #122 follows that the atom-like structure of baryons described within the Everlasting Theory leads to three WEAK maximums/peaks for 105 GeV, 118 GeV and 140 GeV. The posts show also that due to the broadening of masses the MEAN value is (88 + 166)/2 = 127 GeV (not central).

Now you can compare it with the latest ATLAS news:

http://www.atlas.ch/news/2011/figure-combo2.html

Can you see the beautiful consistency of my theoretical results with the experimental data? This is not the Higgs boson. This is the atom-like structure of baryons.
 
Last edited:
The E. Kasner solution for the flat anisotropic model (1921) in the General Theory of Relativity leads to the new cosmology and to the core of baryons and the sham quarks that appear in the reformulated Quantum Chromodynamics. This leads to conclusion that the Kasner solution is the foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravity and foundations of the Quantum Physics without singularities and infinities. The General Theory of Relativity is the more fundamental theory than the Quantum Physics. This postulated Roger Penrose. Moreover, the scales for the charges (weak, electric and strong) in the generalized Kasner solution and the BKL oscillatory model lead to the phase transitions of the fundamental spacetime and to the Protoworldneutrino transition which caused the exit of the early Universe from the black-hole state. The phase transitions are the foundations of the modified/useful string/M theory. There is also the ultimate equation that combines the masses of sources of all types of interactions.
The Everlasting Theory based on the phase transitions of the fundamental/Newtonian spacetime shows where the non-Abelian gauge theories become useless. Due to the phase transitions and entanglement the new fields have the torus-like shapes. They behave in different way than the gauge fields then we must apply new methods. The symmetry group SU(3)×SU(2)×U(1) is incomplete in low-energy regime. There is lack of the stable structures that appear due to the phase transitions of the Newtonian spacetime. The incompleteness causes that the Standard Model does not lead to the superluminal neutrinos and masses of the nucleons. This is also the reason why gravity is separated from the Standard Model.

Now on viXra you can find the extended version of my book, 148 pages A4. There are the new six chapters.
17.
Perihelion Precession of Mercury and Venus, page 111. Within the Everlasting Theory I calculated the exact values for Mercury (573’’) and Venus (204’’).
18.
Foundations of Quantum Physics, pages 112-113. Here, within the Everlasting Theory I derived the Schrodinger equation from the growing loop; I solved the 4/3-factor problem for the mass of classical electron and described the small additional sunward acceleration of the Pioneer spacecraft.
19.
Foundations of General Theory of Relativity, pages 114-115. Here I wrote the lacking initial condition in the GR that causes that there appear many wrong interpretations. Within the Everlasting Theory I described how the sun curves the light – the obtained result is 1.75’’ i.e. the same as within the GR.
20.
The Combination of Quantum Physics and General Theory of Relativity, page 116. I derived the generalized Schrodinger equation and the generalized Einstein energy-momentum equation. The conclusion is as follows. The black holes can emit electromagnetic waves.
21.
General Relativity in Reformulated QCD and New Cosmology, pages 117-119. I showed that the results obtained within the reformulated Quantum Chromodynamics described within the Everlasting Theory lead to the Kasner solution (1921) for the flat anisotropic model described within the General Relativity. This means that the Everlasting Theory ties the Gravity with the reformulated Standard Model. The Kasner solution is the foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravity that leads to the phase transitions of the fundamental spacetime as well. The Kasner solution and the phase transitions solve the singularity problem and eliminate the infinities from the Quantum Physics.
22.
Electroweak Interactions, Non-Abelian Gauge Theories and Origin of E = mcc, pages 120-122. Here I showed that in spite of different methods applied in the mainstream electroweak theory and the Everlasting Theory both theories lead to the same theoretical results but the second theory contains less parameters. In the Everlasting Theory there appears the mass of the Higgs boson 125 GeV and the electroweak scale 250 GeV. I explained why the mass of the Higgs boson is two times smaller than the electroweak scale. I explained also why there is not in existence the Higgs mechanism but there is particle that we can refer to as the Higgs bosons. I described also the origin of the non-Abelian gauge theories. New theory of weak interactions leads to the Einstein formula E = mcc.

I proved also that there indeed leaks the internal structure of nucleons.
On page 128 I wrote the ultimate equation which ties masses of sources of all types of interactions.I extended a few definitions, for example, “DNA” and “Virtual particles”.

The Everlasting Theory is the lacking part/foundations of the ultimate theory.

You can find the extended version of my book here:

http://viXra.org/abs/1203.0021
 
You should read my explanation on Forbes. The identified two issues are not important. My theory does not concern the neutrino speeds obtained in the OPERA experiment only. Within one coherent model I obtained theoretical results consistent with the results obtained in the MINOS experiment and with the observational facts for the supernova SN 1987A as well. I claim that in the repeated OPERA experiment we will obtain the same results.
 
Sylwester Kornowski said:
You should read my explanation on Forbes. The identified two issues are not important. My theory does not concern the neutrino speeds obtained in the OPERA experiment only. Within one coherent model I obtained theoretical results consistent with the results obtained in the MINOS experiment and with the observational facts for the supernova SN 1987A as well.
Click to expand...

That is kind of odd because the SN 1987A and OPERA results were at odd with each other.

I claim that in the repeated OPERA experiment we will obtain the same results.
Click to expand...

What if it doesn't? As I recall you changed your theory to incorporate the super-luminal neutrinos, so will you just change it back?
 
origin said:
That is kind of odd because the SN 1987A and OPERA results were at odd with each other.

What if it doesn't? As I recall you changed your theory to incorporate the super-luminal neutrinos, so will you just change it back?
Click to expand...

Origin, you did not read Chapter "Neutrino Speed" in my book. Within the coherent model we obtain different values of speed for neutrinos in MINOS and OPERA experiments and the neutrinos emitted by the supernova SN 1987A. The superluminal neutrinos arise due to the weak interactions inside the strong field of baryons. In the MINOS experiment dominated the neutrinos from the decays of the muons. In the OPERA experiment dominated the neutrinos from the decays of the relativistic charged pions whereas the neutrinos from the supernova arise due to the decays of the W.

The consistency of my theoretical results with the experimental data and observational facts is perfect.

We can claim that one experiment was wrong but probability that all experimentalists and cosmologists who measured the superluminal speeds of neutrinos are wrong is practically equal to zero.

The Kasner solution for the flat anisotropic model (1921) described within the General Theory of Relativity ties the gravity (there appears the Quantum Gravity) with quantum theory. The Kasner solution leads to the atom-like structure of the baryons described within the Everlasting Theory. The atom-like structure of baryons leads to the superluminal neutrinos.
 
Sylwester Kornowski said:
Origin, you did not read Chapter "Neutrino Speed" in my book.
Click to expand...

Youa are correct on that point!

Within the coherent model we obtain different values of speed for neutrinos in MINOS and OPERA experiments and the neutrinos emitted by the supernova SN 1987A. The superluminal neutrinos arise due to the weak interactions inside the strong field of baryons. In the MINOS experiment dominated the neutrinos from the decays of the muons. In the OPERA experiment dominated the neutrinos from the decays of the relativistic charged pions whereas the neutrinos from the supernova arise due to the decays of the W.

The consistency of my theoretical results with the experimental data and observational facts is perfect.

We can claim that one experiment was wrong but probability that all experimentalists and cosmologists who measured the superluminal speeds of neutrinos are wrong is practically equal to zero.

The Kasner solution for the flat anisotropic model (1921) described within the General Theory of Relativity ties the gravity (there appears the Quantum Gravity) with quantum theory. The Kasner solution leads to the atom-like structure of the baryons described within the Everlasting Theory. The atom-like structure of baryons leads to the superluminal neutrinos.
Click to expand...

Kind of setting yourself up here aren't you. Here is my psychic prediction: In May you will declare that the the scientist are lying and covering up the the truth about super luminal neutrinos when they announce their new findings.
 
No. The meaning of my words was different. I wrote about the hypocrisy and in my opinion it is still up-to-date. My theory ties gravity (the quantum gravity as well) with the modified Standard Model via the Kasner solution. There appears the modified string/M theory as well. I showed how we can eliminate the singularities and infinities from the mainstream theories (there appear the tori for which are characteristic the numbers which appear in the Kasner solution i.e. 0, 1/3, 2/3, 1). And what? Scientists still try to show that the lacking part of the ultimate theory is not in existence. It is just tremendous hypocrisy. Within my Everlasting Theory, i.e. the phase transitions of the gas composed of tachyons (it follows from the General Theory of Relativity as well) plus the Titius-Bode law for the strong and strong gravitational interactions, I showed that there appear the superluminal neutrinos and the theoretical results are consistent with the experimental and observational data. And what? Scientists still try to show that the lacking part of the ultimate theory, i.e. my Everlasting Theory, is not in existence. Hypocrisy! They do not understand that such situation cannot last forever. There will be the time of clearing for them, maybe only after their death. But it will be. And then will be the time for shame. The history shows that even without Internet history of the wars with hypocrisy in physics is not lost.

I must emphasize that there are in existence the superluminal neutrinos but the Einstein theory of relativity is correct because this theory concerns the excited states of the Einstein spacetime and is associated with the ENTANGLED binary systems of neutrinos. The entanglement causes that the speed of light c is the maximum speed for the excited states of the Einstein spacetime components i.e. for the rotating-spin binary systems of neutrinos which are entangled. Photons and gluons cannot be TODAY the superluminal particles.
 
Uh, OK. So if the the next experiments in May show that the neutrinos are not super luminal or shows that they are super lunminal either way that will agree with your theory?:shrug:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top