One thing Sylvester has over you Rajesh, is at least he is man enough, sensible enough, and most importantly honest enough to post in the correct section. Obviously his ego is not as bloated as yours.
Sylwester's 'Everlasting theory'
- Thread starter Sylwester Kornowski
- Start date
One thing Sylvester has over you Rajesh, is at least he is man enough, sensible enough, and most importantly honest enough to post in the correct section. Obviously his ego is not as bloated as yours.
RajeshTrivedi
Valued Senior Member
See, Sylvester,
The response has just started, even without you putting the theory afresh....
And by the way Sylvester, I sincerely praise and admire people like you, you have written so much covering a vast array of subject, even though yours is dissenting view, but that clearly points that you are aware of what is present day theory about all these.
Keep it up, never bother about foolishness and stupidity around........
The response has just started, even without you putting the theory afresh....
And by the way Sylvester, I sincerely praise and admire people like you, you have written so much covering a vast array of subject, even though yours is dissenting view, but that clearly points that you are aware of what is present day theory about all these.
Keep it up, never bother about foolishness and stupidity around........
If a person choses to waste his or her life based of delusions of grandeur and their ego, that's their own choice. The world will keep on keeping on regardless of them. :shrug:
Thank you very much for your nice, instructive and wise words. Especially your words “…even though yours is dissenting view,” show that you understand that, generally, lack of democracy in science leads astray.
Democracy in particle physics…. In communism and pseudo-democracy win theories formulated by politically stronger scientists but it does not mean that there win wiser researchers. It causes that in the peer review journals as well appear nonsensical papers and in my opinion, future will show that the supersymmetric M-theory is the mathematical wonder but the physical nonsense. But they still publish papers concerning this theory. It will end when at energy about 1 TeV we will not detect superpartners predicted by M-theory (1 TeV is the symmetry breaking scale for the scalar fields associated with dilatons). The Scale-Symmetric Physics (S-SP) shows that the mainstream fermion-boson supersymmetry is nonsensical. Just we must reformulate this very important symmetry for particle physics and cosmology. S-SP shows that the pions are the superpartners of nucleons whereas the very early Universe was the superpartner of the cosmic structure which appeared after the inflation but before the observed expansion of our Universe.
Vixra… At present days, the peer review journals will not publish my theory because it shows that M-theory is physically the nonsensical theory. Just I am politically to weak scientist (I am a physicist). So I appreciate the fact that there are the vixra archives because due to vixra, my book and tens of my papers concerning the Scale-Symmetric Physics have the fixed dates of online publishing and a theft of my theory or ideas can be proven. The same concerns this Forum unless a moderator will try to show his/her superiority. I will never betray friends, even when they have problems and powerful enemies. I believe that sooner or later my papers will be both in vixra and scientific journals - it will be when M-theory will collapse (there appeared a few articles suggesting it).
All I see are conspiracy theories, delusions of grandeur, and pseudoscientific nonsense.
Do you write about your posts?
In fact all we have is 29 pages of speudoscientific crap.
To echo the words of one of our poster's I havn't seen for a while way back from page one.........................
To echo the words of one of our poster's I havn't seen for a while way back from page one.........................
I don't need to. They in the main reflect the logical theoretical models that mainstream adhere to and that have stood the required tests. eg: GR
You do not understand what you are reading so discussion is useless.
I understand that as others have noted, your claims, posts are pseudoscience.
On that score, further discussions are certainly useless.
And I further understand that you were permanently banned at "Cosmoquest" for less than polite debate as well as your hypothesis being totally debunked.
Last edited:
I proved in the other thread that your peer review knowledge is very poor. I proved that you do not understand what you are reading and all can see that you are the dishonest person because you formulate the absolute truths without any justification and without scientific arguments.
In your nonsensical posts there is no scientific argument to prove that the Scale-Symmetric Theory, which is the lacking part of TOE, is incorrect. All your posts are the Type ble-ble-ble posts.
You proved nothing other than you are the dishonest one, and delusional to boot.
Your mistaken,I don't need to prove anything. Others have shown you to be grossly out of touch....ble ble ble ble!
Your actions at Cosmoquest also convict you.
You proved nothing other than you are the dishonest one, and delusional to boot.
Your mistaken,I don't need to prove anything. Others have shown you to be grossly out of touch....ble ble ble ble!
Your actions at Cosmoquest also convict you.
Can you prove it? If not then you are a dishonest person. You know, just one scientific argument that my theory is inconsistent with experimental data or that it is incoherent.
In post 1 Sylwester predicts the neutrino is super luminal.
NO, it proves you're a clueless idiot who is now touting GR's differential equations as making predictions you said are wrong in this post. Specifically that the derivation for the gravitational redshift is wrong. It's the first component of the metric goofball. The period of the light observed from remote coordinates is exactly the same as the period of the local proper tick rate where the light is emitted. You've stuck your foot in mouth in every post you'v e made in this thread. Post one in this thread was written by a crank know nothing.
You are a dishonest dunce. Read my post #172 in the thread "Cygnus X - 1 a BNS?"
And yet it is you who is confined to the fringe section,
From another of your friendly neighbourhood dunces.
RajeshTrivedi
Valued Senior Member
Sylwester,
Don't get distracted !! Just go back to your normal routine, as long as people of Paddoboy/Brucep types are here, there cannot be any meaningful discussions on the alternative theories. These people are pro mainstream and they will not understand any alternative logic, they will lap up any absurdities like time travel, worm hole, singularity etc and will never concede any argument. They are just the empty headed cheerleaders, their role is not to question but to follow..
Don't get distracted !! Just go back to your normal routine, as long as people of Paddoboy/Brucep types are here, there cannot be any meaningful discussions on the alternative theories. These people are pro mainstream and they will not understand any alternative logic, they will lap up any absurdities like time travel, worm hole, singularity etc and will never concede any argument. They are just the empty headed cheerleaders, their role is not to question but to follow..
I could look at most of your posts and find disagreement with the recent comments you made to 'only me'. The one where you sum SST+ GR + QM into a theory of everything. All this means is in the past you applied your crank nonsense to try and show where you think GR and QM fail and your nonsense succeeds and now you've given up and want to embrace those theoretical models Folks interested in Internet crankology should read some of Alphanumerics posts to Sylwester Kornowski. That's all folks. Who is the dunce? Probably the guy who claimed the gravitational redshift is wrong. GR, relativity theory, is wrong. Saying it's wrong without understanding it's been experimentally verified in every experiment that tests the the first component of the metric. Like the GPS which tests it 24/7.
Last edited:
You once more proved that you do not understand what you are reading or you are a liar.
All can read the titles of my papers:
"Quantum Physics in the Lacking Part of Ultimate Theory" published in April 2013 (No 1304.0081)
You are a dunce so I must emphasize that the lacking part of ultimate theory is the Scale-Symmetric Theory (SST).
It leads to conclusion that the paper concerns QM + SST.
or
"General Relativity in Quantum Physics and Chaos Theory" published in September 2013 (No 1309.0195)
You are a dunce so I must emphasize that the tangent point for the three teories in the title follows from SST.
It leads to conclusion that the paper concerns SST + QM + GR + ChT.
My book and all my papers (88 papers) show that I never claimed that the foundations of GR or QM are incorrect. I claim, as many scientists as well, that these theories are incomplete so there appear many incorrect interpretations as, for example, the time loops or many-worlds interpretation. I and many scientists claim it because in the leading mainstream theories appear infinities, indeterminate mathematical forms, approximations, mathematical tricks and free parameters. GR and QM are the incomplete theories and it is not my position only - the same concerns the mainstream string theory but this theory, contrary to the GR and QM , is as well the useless theory and AlphaNumeric was unable to understand it. My SST is the realistic/unique string theory (read my paper). All can see it besides the dishonest dunces.
So now all can see that you are the big dunce.
Future will show that TOE = SST + QM + GR. Just the SST limits the GR and QM so there do not appear the infinities, indeterminate forms, approximations, mathematical tricks and free parameters. Just due to SST, the two leading theories become the complete theories.
I wrote it many times using different words but dunces cannot understand my very simple posts.
Below is the link to my new paper (7 pages)
http://vixra.org/abs/1507.0002
The Scale-Symmetric Theory as the Lacking Part of the Theory of Everything
Abstract
Here we present the new structure of the Theory of Everything (ToE or SQUARE Theory).
The time problem that concerns the General Relativity (GR) and Quantum Mechanics (QM) (contrary to QM, in GR is not a distinguished physical time) suggests that the irreversible separation of GR and QM during the inflation is the good idea - just there was created the two-component spacetime with very different properties of the two components. One component is directly associated with gravitational fields whereas the second with the Standard-Model interactions and particles. It causes that unification of GR and QM within the same methods is impossible.
The separation of GR and QM follows from the succeeding phase transitions of the superluminal Higgs field that existence results from the extended GR (the phase transitions are described within the unique Scale-Symmetric Theory (SST)).
The SST shows that both theories, i.e. GR and QM, start from correct but incomplete sets of initial conditions. It causes that, generally, they lead to experimental data so both are the correct theories but due to the incompleteness, there appear as well the not numerous incorrect solutions i.e. solutions that cannot be realized by Nature.
The Scale-Symmetric Theory limits the GR and QM in such a way that there do not appear infinities, indeterminate mathematical forms, approximations, mathematical tricks and free parameters.
Nature on lower and lower levels should be simpler and simpler, not more and more complex as it is in the not unique Loop Quantum Gravity or the not unique string/M-theory. We do not need new differential equations to solve the tremendous number of unsolved basic problems - we need a very simple theory that limits the GR and QM and describes the scales below the Planck scale and solves all problems above this scale and SST is such a theory.
In the RHIC experiment we can test the SST.
http://vixra.org/abs/1507.0002
The Scale-Symmetric Theory as the Lacking Part of the Theory of Everything
Abstract
Here we present the new structure of the Theory of Everything (ToE or SQUARE Theory).
The time problem that concerns the General Relativity (GR) and Quantum Mechanics (QM) (contrary to QM, in GR is not a distinguished physical time) suggests that the irreversible separation of GR and QM during the inflation is the good idea - just there was created the two-component spacetime with very different properties of the two components. One component is directly associated with gravitational fields whereas the second with the Standard-Model interactions and particles. It causes that unification of GR and QM within the same methods is impossible.
The separation of GR and QM follows from the succeeding phase transitions of the superluminal Higgs field that existence results from the extended GR (the phase transitions are described within the unique Scale-Symmetric Theory (SST)).
The SST shows that both theories, i.e. GR and QM, start from correct but incomplete sets of initial conditions. It causes that, generally, they lead to experimental data so both are the correct theories but due to the incompleteness, there appear as well the not numerous incorrect solutions i.e. solutions that cannot be realized by Nature.
The Scale-Symmetric Theory limits the GR and QM in such a way that there do not appear infinities, indeterminate mathematical forms, approximations, mathematical tricks and free parameters.
Nature on lower and lower levels should be simpler and simpler, not more and more complex as it is in the not unique Loop Quantum Gravity or the not unique string/M-theory. We do not need new differential equations to solve the tremendous number of unsolved basic problems - we need a very simple theory that limits the GR and QM and describes the scales below the Planck scale and solves all problems above this scale and SST is such a theory.
In the RHIC experiment we can test the SST.