Sylwester's 'Everlasting theory'

Brucep, you are very weak thinker. You even do not know what you want to prove. You know, at first you should DEFINE a problem on base of some scientific arguments. Next, you should write where my theory is inconsistent with the scientific arguments – just some example from my book or my posts. Next, you can formulate your opinion BUT YOU SHOULD TAKE INTO ACCOUNT MY EXPLANATIONS because I always add the scientific arguments. If you cannot discuss according the common rules then our discussion will be useless, just ble, ble… which is typical for dunces and fanatics.

So once more:
1.
The Everlasting theory leads to the initial conditions applied in the mainstream theories, especially to the General Theory of Relativity and the Quantum Physics. It is because the Everlasting Theory is the most fundamental theory.
2.
The Everlasting Theory shows that the initial conditions applied in the today mainstream theories are incomplete so there appear many wrong interpretations. It is obvious that no one today mainstream theory describes internal structure of the spacetime(s) fully. It causes that there appear the singularities and infinities or wrong initial conditions as in the string/M theory – just the elementary closed strings have much smaller size and are inflexible.
3.
In the Everlasting Theory I apply the relativistic formulae derived by Einstein and the Uncertainty Principle to describe the atom-like structure of baryons. My theory shows that the Special Theory of Relativity is incomplete ONLY for strong interactions and there is the proof i.e. the running coupling for strong interactions. We can explain the asymptotic freedom WITHOUT NEW PARAMETERS only assuming that for the strong interactions the Special Theory of Relativity is incomplete. It is incomplete because this theory says nothing about the internal structure of the Einstein spacetime components and the interactions of the baryons with the spacetime.
4.
The General Theory of Relativity is incomplete as well due to the same reason as the Special Theory of Relativity. The entanglement which acts in the spacetime causes that we cannot calculate exact value of the perihelion precession of Venus i.e. the 204 arc seconds per century.
5.
Within my theory, we can in natural manner (i.e. without NEW PARAMETERS) explain asymptotic freedom, confinement and mass gaps as well.
And so on.

There is very simple way to distinguish better theory from the worse theories. Better theory describes MORE and applies LESS the parameters. There is no one mainstream theory within which we can describe origin and calculate the basic physical constants. My theory contains at least 3 TIMES less the parameters than the Standard Model.
 
Sylwester Kornowski said:
Brucep, you are very weak thinker. You even do not know what you want to prove. You know, at first you should DEFINE a problem on base of some scientific arguments. Next, you should write where my theory is inconsistent with the scientific arguments – just some example from my book or my posts. Next, you can formulate your opinion BUT YOU SHOULD TAKE INTO ACCOUNT MY EXPLANATIONS because I always add the scientific arguments. If you cannot discuss according the common rules then our discussion will be useless, just ble, ble… which is typical for dunces and fanatics.



So once more:
1.
The Everlasting theory leads to the initial conditions applied in the mainstream theories, especially to the General Theory of Relativity and the Quantum Physics. It is because the Everlasting Theory is the most fundamental theory.
2.
The Everlasting Theory shows that the initial conditions applied in the today mainstream theories are incomplete so there appear many wrong interpretations. It is obvious that no one today mainstream theory describes internal structure of the spacetime(s) fully. It causes that there appear the singularities and infinities or wrong initial conditions as in the string/M theory – just the elementary closed strings have much smaller size and are inflexible.
3.
In the Everlasting Theory I apply the relativistic formulae derived by Einstein and the Uncertainty Principle to describe the atom-like structure of baryons. My theory shows that the Special Theory of Relativity is incomplete ONLY for strong interactions and there is the proof i.e. the running coupling for strong interactions. We can explain the asymptotic freedom WITHOUT NEW PARAMETERS only assuming that for the strong interactions the Special Theory of Relativity is incomplete. It is incomplete because this theory says nothing about the internal structure of the Einstein spacetime components and the interactions of the baryons with the spacetime.
4.
The General Theory of Relativity is incomplete as well due to the same reason as the Special Theory of Relativity. The entanglement which acts in the spacetime causes that we cannot calculate exact value of the perihelion precession of Venus i.e. the 204 arc seconds per century.
5.
Within my theory, we can in natural manner (i.e. without NEW PARAMETERS) explain asymptotic freedom, confinement and mass gaps as well.
And so on.

There is very simple way to distinguish better theory from the worse theories. Better theory describes MORE and applies LESS the parameters. There is no one mainstream theory within which we can describe origin and calculate the basic physical constants. My theory contains at least 3 TIMES less the parameters than the Standard Model.
Click to expand...

You're orbiting the dunce stool. No scientist is using your arithmetic theory for research. Even after 48 years. That's because it's complete nonsense and useless scientifically. It's a hodgepodge of useless information propagating over 48 years of intellectual dishonesty. The only reason it's being discussed is because you bring it up in a public science forum. If it was useful it would be used. It's not being used because it has no scientific value. Bottom line it's not being used scientifically. It has no scientific value. Did I mention it's not being used because it has no scientific value? That's my final comment other than to say it's really stupid to claim General Relativity is a incomplete theory.
 
Sylwester Kornowski said:
AlphaNumeric, the Everlasting Theory, which is the lacking part of the ultimate theory, shows that the confinement is the FOUNDATIONS NEEDED to prove the mass gap existence. No one will win the Yang-Mills millennium prize neglecting confinement. Peoples say wrong things because they do not understand the confinement and mass gap. In my previous posts I described the origin of these physical quantities. It is obvious that the confinement is the prelude to the mass gap.
Click to expand...
Nice attempt at back peddling. The issue was whether or not the Millenium Prize is about confinement. I had said QCD confines and you had said "You don't know that! There's a prize of $1 million to anyone who can prove confinement!". I then explained to you, using references to the original paper defining the problem, that the prize wasn't for confinement but rather existence of Yang Mills and its mass gap, that confinement is a closely related but different problem and thus proving confinement might not necessarily win the prize. Thus showing your assertion the prize is about confinement to be false. I also illustrated you didn't know what the 'existence' part of the prize pertained to.

Now you've attempted to change the scope of what you're talking about by now saying that according to you it isn't possible to win the prize without showing confinement since according to you they are too closely linked to be provable separately. That is different from what the prize is. The prize is for showing X, not Y, it is you who is saying X and Y come as a package. What your work says is irrelevant to the definition of the prize. Someone has said "You get a million dollars if you prove Yang Mills existence and mass gap", no mention of confinement there. That is what I was correcting you on. The fact you say confinement is both necessary and sufficient in this problem is an entirely different matter.

You've confusing the scope of your 'solution' with the scope of the question. You asserted something about the question, ie it asked for confinement, and I corrected you on it. I've asked you several times a pretty simple direct question : Do you accept the prize is not for confinement, and you have avoided answering. Instead you just assert things about your answer to the prize, which is a different matter.

You don't seem to realise no one gives a toss about what your 'everlasting theory' has to so on the matter. It seems to be your standard defence mechanism, when someone backs you into a corner and shows you don't understand what you're talking about you try to change the subject by making more vapid worthless assertions about your fundamentally flawed ideas. Your inability to accept correction on anything, even when its right there in black and white on the screen for all to see, shows you aren't interested in honest scientific discourse, you just want to proclaim you have all of the answers. Too bad you cannot answer simple direct questions.
 
All can see that the “discussion” presented by brucep is a very "funny" "discussion". It is just nursery school child level.

So what are the exact masses of the up and down quarks? The QCD starts from these quarks. The 48 years (since 1964) without a progress. Why there is founded the Yang-Mills millennium prize? You know, it is because the SM is at least incomplete!
Just I waste my time for the stupid discussion with brucep.

Arrivederci Roma brucep
 
AlphaNumeric, do you accept following standpoint presented in Wikipedia?

“Proof that QCD confines at low energy is a mathematical problem of great relevance, and an award has been proposed by the Clay Mathematics Institute for whoever is ALSO able to show that the Yang–Mills theory has a mass gap and its existence.”

I accept this standpoint because it is consistent with my theory! On the other hand, many scientists claim that the confinement is the part of the Yang-Mills and that confinement has not been proven applying the mathematical physics. This means that to prove the Yang-Mills existence, we must prove within the methods applied in the mathematical physics that the Yang-Mills confines at low energy as well.

Do you not think that it could be better to discuss the phenomena associated with the confinement, mass gap, asymptotic freedom, and so on? Do you not think that it could be better to show that we cannot prove the mass gap existence without the confinement? I can show you how it acts in my theory. But, of course, it is your choice.
 
AlphaNumeric, in short I described the above mentioned physical quantities in the post #258, but there can appear more detailed questions, for example, such as follows.

1.
Why confinement is the color force?
2.
Why the color force is constant and does not depend on distance between the quarks?
3.
What are the phenomena associated with the hadronization?
4.
How looks surface of the screened quarks?
5.
Why the quarks and gluons are deconfined in the sham Quark-Gluon Plasma (the QGP)?
6.
Why the stabilized glueballs lead to the mass gaps?
7.
What is the difference between the deconfinement and asymptotic freedom?
8.
Why we still cannot prove that the QCD confines at low energy?
9.
What is the internal structure of the gluons and the sham quarks?

….and so on.

Are you able to answer these questions within the QCD? You know, just the physical meaning. I can in simple way answer these questions within the Everlasting Theory because the ET is much fundamental theory than the QCD.
 
Sylwester Kornowski said:
All can see that the “discussion” presented by brucep is a very "funny" "discussion". It is just nursery school child level.

So what are the exact masses of the up and down quarks? The QCD starts from these quarks. The 48 years (since 1964) without a progress. Why there is founded the Yang-Mills millennium prize? You know, it is because the SM is at least incomplete!
Just I waste my time for the stupid discussion with brucep.

Arrivederci Roma brucep
Click to expand...

You can't understand what I wrote down because you don't want to. You're an intellectually dishonest crackpot who surely flunked nursery school. The fact remains no physicist uses your arithmetic theory to do research. No derivations from your theory. That means your theory is nothing more than irresponsible assertions spewing forth from it's crackpot author. IE you dummy.
 
brucep said:
You can't understand what I wrote down because you don't want to. You're an intellectually dishonest crackpot who surely flunked nursery school. The fact remains no physicist uses your arithmetic theory to do research. No derivations from your theory. That means your theory is nothing more than irresponsible assertions spewing forth from it's crackpot author. IE you dummy.
Click to expand...

Without my arithmetic theory scientists never will be able to prove that the QCD confines at low energy, never will be able to calculate the exact masses of the up and down quarks, never will be able to describe origin of the physical constants and calculate their values because to do it is needed more fundamental theory than the Standard Model and General Theory of Relativity. They will be unable to calculate next tens basic physical quantities as well.

Scientists need the NON-PERTURBATIVE/ARITHMETIC Everlasting Theory to solve the hundreds (!) unsolved basic problems. For example, in Wikipedia you can find the descriptions of the tens unsolved basic problems in particle physics and cosmology. It is XXI century and we still do not know the origin of the Planck constant, gravitational constant, speed of light, electric charge, mass of electron, and so on. You can find the solution in my Everlasting Theory. This theory is the foundations of physics and soon professors will teach it on universities and teachers in schools.

You wrote that I do not understand your logic. There is no logic. You know, at first you MUST PRECISE what you want to prove.
 
In this post I explain the origin of the limitations in the asymptotic freedom described within the mainstream perturbative QCD. The limitations follow from the fact that scientists neglected the atom-like structure of baryons. The perturbative QCD does not lead to correct results for the asymptotic freedom in the low energy regime and there appears the mass scale whereas my non-perturbative theory is valid in whole spectrum of energy. I will explain it on base of my Everlasting Theory so on base of my reformulated QCD as well.

At first, I will point the important things concerning the asymptotic freedom in the mainstream QCD.
1.
In the Lagrangian appear the dimensionless coupling constants. We can change one of them on the free dimensional parameter i.e. the QCD scale i.e. the lambda parameter. Its central value is 217 MeV. The lambda parameter sets the scale at which the alpha_strong becomes large i.e. below this mass/energy we cannot apply the perturbative QCD. We must apply some non-perturbative theory.
2.
In the perturbative QCD appears the mass scale which is chosen arbitrary. The asymptotic freedom is for mass scale greater than about 5 GeV and much smaller than the mass of the top quark i.e. about 172 GeV.
3.
The QCD is asymptotically free thus for large energy we can use perturbative theory safely.
4.
In perturbative QCD absolute value of alpha_strong has to be OBTAINED FROM EXPERIMENT. Today the fundamental parameter is the alpha_strong for the mass of the Z boson (91.19 GeV). The experimental data for the mass of the Z boson are as follows (see hep-ex/0407021, (2004)):
Alpha_strong(mass of Z boson) = 0.1182 ± 0.0027.
The QCD gives 0.118 ± 0.006.

Now the Everlasting Theory
1.
The reformulated QCD shows (see formulae (215) and (216)) that for energies higher and higher than about 3.3 GeV, the masses of the created gluon balls are smaller and smaller i.e. when energy increases then alpha_strong decreases. Can you see that in the Everlasting Theory the mass scale is NOT chosen arbitrary? From it follows that we should observe in the mainstream PERTURBATIVE QCD the asymptotic freedom as well but for energies much greater than about 3.3 GeV. This mass is greater than the mass of the charm quark. This means that the mainstream QCD should describe correctly the asymptotic freedom for the bottom quark as well (its mass is about 4.2 GeV). It was done by Gross, Wilczek and Politzer. For it was the Nobel Prize in 2004.
2.
The asymptotic freedom within the Everlasting Theory I described in the post #258. It follows from the law of conservation of spin, atom-like structure of baryons and Uncertainty Principle. When energy increases then mass of the carriers of the strong interactions decreases. This follows from the coupling of the core of baryons with the Einstein spacetime. It is obligatory for the whole spectrum of energies and for the mass of the Z boson we obtain following central value (see formulae (81), (83) and (86)):
Alpha_strong(mass of Z boson) = 0.1176 ± 0.0005.
This value is consistent with experimental result.
3.
What is physical meaning of the lambda parameter 217 MeV (+25, -23)?
The atom-like structure of baryons shows that in the d = 1 state, which lies under the Schwarzschild surface for the strong interactions, there can be the relativistic neutral pion which mass is about 209 MeV or relativistic charged pion which mass is about 216 MeV (see Table 1, page 18). Both masses are consistent with value of the lambda parameter. This shows that for energies below the lambda parameter we must apply the non-perturbative Everlasting Theory because we cannot neglect the relativistic masses of the pions which are the carriers of the strong interactions as well.
4.
There should be differences for the alpha_strong for very high energies. For example, for energy 2.76 TeV I obtained alpha_strong = 0.114.


In this post I tried to show the close relations between the mainstream QCD and the Everlasting Theory. All can see that the Everlasting Theory, especially the atom-like structure of baryons, shows the origin of the limitations in the mainstream QCD.

Recapitulation
The Everlasting Theory leads to the charged core. Its mass is 727.44 MeV. Such core produces VIRTUAL gluons which masses are ±727.44 MeV. On the other hand, in this paper (see my post #263)

J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 38 (2011) 045003 (17pp),

O Oliveira and P Bicudo find that “the infrared data (low energy) can be associated with a CONSTANT GLUON MASS of 723(11) MeV, if one excludes the zero momentum gluon propagator from the analysis.”
Can you see that the infrared data lead to the core of baryons?
The QCD scale 217 MeV (+25, -23) leads to the relativistic pion in the d = 1 state which follows from the Titius-Bode law for the strong interactions.
The mainstream asymptotic freedom concerns the mass spectrum which follows from the interactions only so to fit the theoretical results to experimental data there appears the free parameter i.e. the QCD scale i.e. the lambda parameter. In this parameter is coded PARTIALLY the atom-like structure of baryons but such conclusion follows from the Everlasting Theory only. The limitations follow from the fact that the mainstream asymptotic freedom fully neglects the internal structure of the core of baryons.
In my book you can find the next experimental data which lead to the atom-like structure of baryons (see pages 5 and 6, especially point 4).
As I showed above, within the Everlasting Theory we can explain origin of the all limitations typical for the asymptotic freedom described within the mainstream perturbative QCD. Just the Everlasting Theory is the more fundamental theory than the QCD.

BTW, in the gluon balls the partons, i.e. the carriers of the gluons – they are the components of the quarks as well, are entangled (there can be the shortest distances characteristic for the entanglement as well) and confined. But origin of the entanglement, confinement and mass gap is the other story.
 
Confinement and mass gap in the Everlasting Theory

To explain the inflation, entanglement, the cohesion of the Quantum Theory of Fields and constancy of the speed of light, we need spacetime composed of tachyons. On the other hand, there are the two long-distance interactions (i.e. gravity and electromagnetism) which suggest that there are two parallel spacetimes i.e. the tachyon gas, which I call the Newtonian-spacetime or the modified Higgs field (it is the scalar field), and the Einstein-spacetime. The Einstein-spacetime components suck in the tachyons so nearly the Einstein-spacetime components there is the negative pressure in the modified Higgs field. Such processes do not change gravitational mass of the Einstein-spacetime components. Energy vortices cause that inside them the Einstein-spacetime components are in mean distance smaller than the range of the negative pressure. It leads to conclusion that inside energy vortices, the mean distance between the Einstein-spacetime components is smaller than the mean distance. Because the Einstein-spacetime components have gravitational mass then the energy vortices acquire additional mass visible by detectors. It is the mass gap. It is the modified Higgs mechanism which follows from the confinement associated with the negative pressure in the modified Higgs field nearly the Einstein-spacetime components.
The confinement arises as well when carriers of gluons are exchanged between some components of hadrons, for example, between the sham quarks. Such confinement looks as a spoke – it is the reason why confinement does not depend on distance of, for example, the sham quarks.
The detected Higgs boson (125 GeV) arises due to the modified Higgs mechanism and existence of this Higgs boson follows from the phenomena which take place inside the core of baryons. These phenomena I described within the Everlasting Theory.
We can say that the detected Higgs boson is the sham Higgs boson because its existence follows from the modified Higgs mechanism.
Pressure in the modified Higgs field is tremendous so this tachyon gas behaves as liquid. Due to the four phase transitions of the modified Higgs field there arise the fundamental fermions i.e. the inflexible closed strings from which the Einstein spacetime components consist of, the neutrinos, cores of baryons and the objects after the era of inflation.

The mainstream theories are incomplete because they neglect the internal structure of BARE fermions but even of photons because their carriers, i.e. the Einstein-spacetime components, are the binary systems of fermions. The bare fermions consist of torus and ball in its centre. Due to the phase transitions of the modified Higgs field there are four different sizes of the tori i.e. the torus of neutrinos, torus of baryons, torus of electrons and the cosmic torus. From the cosmic torus was created the dark energy i.e. the thickened Einstein-spacetime.
So once more: Inside the four from five basic bare fermions, i.e. neutrinos, cores of baryons, bare electrons and protoworlds, there is tire-like torus and there is ball which represents an axis of a wheel. Moreover, the exchanged Einstein-spacetime components, between tire-like torus and ball-axis, produce confinements which look as spokes. The spokes composed of the confined components of the Einstein-spacetime, appear outside the bare particles as well.

We can say that the mainstream theories are incomplete because they neglect the internal structure of the bare fundamental fermions i.e. the “spoke-like wheels” inside the bare fermions. We cannot mathematically describe this reach structure within the Quantum Theory of Fields in such way to add it to Lagrangian. Just such structure is too complex. We must apply new very simple methods which I described within the Everlasting Theory. Why the Everlasting Theory is such simple, even simpler than the Newtonian mechanics? It is because the nature on its lowest levels once again behaves classically. There appear the stable tori and balls in their centers and the exchanged particles are the classical Einstein-spacetime components or are built of from such classical components.
 
Sylwester Kornowski said:
Pressure in the modified Higgs field is tremendous so this tachyon gas behaves as liquid. Due to the four phase transitions of the modified Higgs field there arise the fundamental fermions i.e. the inflexible closed strings from which the Einstein spacetime components consist of, the neutrinos, cores of baryons and the objects after the era of inflation.
Click to expand...

I have been meaning to say this for a long time. If you can make up gobbilty goop like the word salad above, you can CERTAINLY come up with a better name for you theory than the Everlasting Theory! I mean, come on, mkay. For crying out loud the best part of almost every pseudoscientific idea is the cool whiz-bang name.

I for one am very dissapointed.
 
Origin, your last post is typical for fanatics – there is lack of scientific arguments but there is the bigotry.
Fanatics think that thinking people will not see worthlessness of such posts as your last post.

Where are your scientific arguments? Are you unable to write them?
 
We can say that the confinement breaks symmetry between the weak force and gravitational force. The confinement is responsible as well for the big drop in value of the running coupling for the strong interactions for energy about 2 GeV and higher.

We can unify the gravity with the Standard Model via the confinement described within the Everlasting Theory. We need the two spacetimes and the Einstein-spacetime components (i.e. the binary systems of neutrinos) which properties I described within my theory. These properties follow from the phase transitions of the fundamental/Newtonian spacetime which I call the modified Higgs field as well.
 
Sylwester Kornowski said:
Origin, your last post is typical for fanatics – there is lack of scientific arguments but there is the bigotry.
Fanatics think that thinking people will not see worthlessness of such posts as your last post.

Where are your scientific arguments? Are you unable to write them?
Click to expand...

People much smarter than I have pointed out errors and problems with your ideas and you just ignore them so there is no point, is there. You are a classic pseudo-science hack. You pick and choose snipits of real science if they in any way supports your idea and reject anything that does not. The funniest one is the neutrino saga - an experiment supported superluminal velocity and you jumped on board and fully embraced the idea, new data was presented that showed that neutrinos were not superluminal and you rejected it out of hand. It is really quite clear that your everlasting fantasy is just that - a fantasy and not worth anyone's time.
 
Origin, do you write the nonsensical sentences to increase the number of your posts?

If you do not understand something then you should formulate a question. Then, I will answer your question. Do you understand my simple sentences? Do you know how scientific discussion should look?

I can see that you are a little absent-minded. Just concentrate because you compromise yourself.

Trolling?
 
Sylwester Kornowski said:
Origin, do you write the nonsensical sentences to increase the number of your posts?

If you do not understand something then you should formulate a question. Then, I will answer your question. Do you understand my simple sentences? Do you know how scientific discussion should look?

I can see that you are a little absent-minded. Just concentrate because you compromise yourself.

Trolling?
Click to expand...

Origin is spot on. You're the one trolling your arithmetic nonsense theory. Back again dufus?
 
Sylwester Kornowski said:
Without my arithmetic theory scientists never will be able to prove that the QCD confines at low energy, never will be able to calculate the exact masses of the up and down quarks, never will be able to describe origin of the physical constants and calculate their values because to do it is needed more fundamental theory than the Standard Model and General Theory of Relativity. They will be unable to calculate next tens basic physical quantities as well.

Scientists need the NON-PERTURBATIVE/ARITHMETIC Everlasting Theory to solve the hundreds (!) unsolved basic problems. For example, in Wikipedia you can find the descriptions of the tens unsolved basic problems in particle physics and cosmology. It is XXI century and we still do not know the origin of the Planck constant, gravitational constant, speed of light, electric charge, mass of electron, and so on. You can find the solution in my Everlasting Theory. This theory is the foundations of physics and soon professors will teach it on universities and teachers in schools.

You wrote that I do not understand your logic. There is no logic. You know, at first you MUST PRECISE what you want to prove.
Click to expand...

Nobody gives a crap about your bs theory. It's irrelevant. Name one research project where a physicist uses your theory. Name one person who acknowledges you and your theory exist as real natural phenomena. 48 years of rejection. Pinhead.
 
Brucep, fiddle-de-dee, fiddle-de-dee, .....
You even are unable to define a problem. You know, I wrote at large about asymptotic freedom, confinement and mass gap in the Everlasting Theory. I wrote that my confinement leads to unification of gravity and Standard Model but at first we must add the two spacetimes and the phase transitions of the modified Higgs field (i.e. Newtonian spacetime composed of tachyons). I solved problems which we cannot solve within the mainstream theories. It is because these theories neglect the internal structure of the bare particles. The nature on its lowest levels ONCE AGAIN BECOMES CLASSICAL.

The discovered Higgs boson (125 GeV) is the sham Higgs boson. When we assume that it is the predicted Higgs boson then there appears the hierarchy problem i.e. then we cannot answer following question: Why there is such tremendous mass distance between the Planck critical mass (about 2.2*10^-8 kg) and the sham Higgs boson? In my theory such problem does not appear. In reality, the real Higgs bosons are the Einstein spacetime components i.e. the classical binary systems of neutrinos! Whereas, due to additional energy and my CONFINEMENT, there appear the MASS GAPS and the discovered sham Higgs boson is one of such mass gaps.

Brucep, my posts are not for dunces.
 
Within the mainstream theories we cannot describe physical meaning of the Planck critical mass 2.2*10^-8 kg because they are the incomplete theories. Such description is very simple within the Everlasting Theory just due the properties of the TWO spacetimes and the internal structure of the Einstein spacetime components i.e. the classical binary systems of neutrinos.
 
Sylwester Kornowski said:
Within the mainstream theories we cannot describe physical meaning of the Planck critical mass 2.2*10^-8 kg because they are the incomplete theories. Such description is very simple within the Everlasting Theory just due the properties of the TWO spacetimes and the internal structure of the Einstein spacetime components i.e. the classical binary systems of neutrinos.
Click to expand...

You might as well face facts: until your 'theory' is accepted and published by a respectable journal, absolutely no one is going to pay it any attention.

And since it's doubtful you can outlive another 48 years of rejection, it's most likely to die with you - at absolutely no loss to the scientific world.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top