Supernova From Experimentation At Fermilab

SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB

SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB

All friends and colleagues: please relay this information to all interested groups, websites, accelerator personnel, etc..

The values now given for Fermilab as seen on the Tevatron Status of the Acclerator Update posted on the homepage for FERMILAB are now set at about 2 TeV. This is a marked increase from the previous value of 1.8 TeV. The luminosity also increases after the initial value of about 7.6E30 to much higher values as the experiment proceeds. Please monitor the Accelerator Update live status to observe these effects.

The article in the Astronomical Journal (Leibgundgut, B., et al., (1993) SN 1991BG: A Type 1A Supernova with a difference (1) January 301-313) shows evidence for a supernova which has deflagrated below the Chandresekhar limit at .7 solar masses. This was also chronicled in the journal, Nature. Also from Peter M. Garnavich, "Early Spectra of Supernova 1993J in MB1, Astronomy Journal, 108 (3) (1994) on page 1006 it is stated: "The observed drop in H alpha flux inserted in this model implies a zero radius for the progenitor at March 29.5 regardless of expansion velocity assumed. This is clearly unphysical." Unless, it is as here postulated, a transition towards de Sitter space which provides for those vast energies of supernova deflagration: which is then clearly physical and of nearly zero dimensionality.

Every child on earth will thank you for your kind efforts on their behalf now and for all future time.

All Best Wishes for the New Year !!!

Yours sincerely,

Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
Supernova from Experimentation
 
Last edited:
Dixagnosis

PWD's condition seems to be perseverance. Look it up in your Funk and Wagnall's or any psychopathology text.

Know what Ph.D. stands for?

"Piled higher and Deeper"

:rolleyes:
 
SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB

SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB

Many thanks for everyone's kind suggestions in this most pressing concern.

Since the essential hypothesis which began this work comes from the conception that Type IA supernovae are caused by sentient entities much like ourselves who destroy themsleves via high-energy physics experimentation, how could this be the case since it is clear that this level of technological expertise implies in most cases a knowledge of the vast energies found in de Sitter space?

Let us consider a matrix of historical causation which includes social, political and economic factors, etc., which motivate a continued reckless progress into the unknown despite all evidence as to their possible extinction via the vaporization of their planet of origination. Such is now clearly the case at the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, whose staff, while fully appraised of the their imminent demise, are continuing to increase those energies of experimentation regardless of possible consequences; whereby, we are all plunging to our doom. Please note: the Tevatron Live Status on the Accelerator Update of the Fermilab homepage.

All of the children now and at all future time will thank you for your kind efforts on their behalf.

Wishing Everyone a Very Happy and Healthy New Year!!!

All Best Wishes,

Yours sincerely,

Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
Supernova from Experimentation
 
Last edited:
Let us also consider that Paul Dixon is somewhat less qualified to judge these things than the Fermilab physicists.
 
Qualifications

Qualifications are only part of it. There is a fixation and compulsive verbal syndrome at work here, I think.
 
Type IA supernovae are caused by sentient entities much like ourselves who destroy themsleves via high-energy physics experimentation
Click to expand...

Such is now clearly the case at the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, whose staff, while fully appraised of the their imminent demise, are continuing to increase those energies of experimentation regardless of possible consequences; whereby, we are all plunging to our doom.
Click to expand...

Hey Paul,

Not only are you a complete nutter....

All of the children now and at all future time will thank you for your kind efforts on their behalf.
Click to expand...

Wishing Everyone a Very Happy and Healthy New Year!!!
Click to expand...

...but you're also a polite nutter! :D

Happy New Year to you too! But according to you, we might not be here to enjoy it! :rolleyes:
 
Brainpans

Yep. What happens when you try to pour 1 qt. of concepts into a 1 c. brainpan? Overflow and massive spillage.

:eek:
 
In this new year, I predict, this thread will continue as long as Sciforums exists....or Paul checks in to a Nursing Home.
 
SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB

SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB

All good friends and colleagues: Many thanks for your kind interest in these most tragic concerns.

As chronicled in the FermiNews, please check with the search engine. google.com (Paul Dixon Supernova) you may view a news photograph of our first picketing of The Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory in Batavia. Illinois. We were greatly honoured to speak with the scientists as they came to visit with us and we asked them specifically if they were aware of the dangers of supernova generation through the vast energies at work in the accelerator ring. They said they were aware of the dangers inherent in their work in forming a transition to the already existing de Sitter space. We then very politely inquired as to why they continued with this work in the light of these very great dangers. Their reply was two-fold in nature:

1. They wished to continue with their employment and did not wish to work for, "Ma Bell Illinois," the telephone company of Illinois. In other words, they wished to continue with their current employment status.

2. Their interest was in the pursuit of truth, a kind of philosophic quest for truth by means of their experiment in high-energy physics. They did not deny that this research was extremely dangerous for everyone including themselves yet they wished to purse the research for these two reasons.

As a scientist, this made good sense to me. My companions on the picket line and others with whom I subsequently discussed this matter, however, viewed this as gravely irresponsilble! They indicated that this was a very selfish act on their part to risk everyone's saftey for their own personal advancement.

All the children now and for future time will thank you for your kind efforts on their behalf.

Wishing everyone a VERY HAPPY NEW YEAR 2002 !!!

Yours sincerely,

Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
Supernova from Experimentation
 
Last edited:
SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB

SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB

All friends and colleagues: many kind thanks for your most needed assistance in this most pressing historical concern.

It is time now for us to bring together our common humanity and to stand for the continuance of our precious home and birthplace, this planet earth. This unification of common will and shared humanity is all that finally stands between us and the termination of all that we hold most dear in friends and family.

Let us echo the words of Horace Mann, the first President of Antioch College in Yellow Springs, Ohio: "Be ashamed to die until you have won some victory for humanity."

All the children will thank you now and for all eternity for your kind efforts on their behalf.

Yours sincerely,

Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
Supernova from Experimentation
 
SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB

SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB

Many, many thanks for everyone's kind thoughts and concern in this most tragic high-energy physics experimentation.

Consider the trillions upon trillions of galaxies each with their trillions upon trillions of stars which are ours to explore and to comprehend if we are able to persevere and not self-destruct with our advancing technological expertise. Let us proceed with caution and preserve the future for all the children of these many years. We have everything to gain and very little to loose if we maintain a prudent course into all future time with due regard for the perils and traps that nature has placed in our way.

All best wishes for the NEW YEAR!!!

Yours sincerely,

Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
Supernova from Experimentation
 
Trillyuns and Trillyuns...

More bumph. There are 100s of billions of galaxies at most recent best guess, not trillions.:rolleyes:
 
SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATON AT FERMILAB

SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB

All good fiends and colleagues: many kind thanks for your earnest interest and endeavours upon this most tragic concern.

In science, we may follow the thought of Sir Francis Bacon and also more modern philosophy in the thought of William James and Charles Sanders Pierce in Pragmatism. The general concept is termed induction, in that a conclusion in derived from a sampling of data rather than from all the data within a given domain of interest. Thus, for example, the Hubble observatory has given us the number of 125 billions of galaxies in the observable universe. There has not been, to my knowledge a claim so far of anyone's having detected the edge of the universe. It may then be inductively stated: that the distribution of galaxies continues beyond those now within the observable universe. Thus we have the standard conclusion that there are many trillions of galaxies in the entire universe.

The presence of life, as an emergent property, may also be inductively concluded in modern science. Thus, it may assumed that where the conditions for life obtain, it will almost inevitably occur. In this way, also sentience, as a result of evolutionary development within a given ecosphere, should also be in evidence in a statistical sense acrosss this broad domain of trillions upon trillions of planetary formations.

All of the children now and for all future time will thank you for your kind efforts on their behalf.

All Best Wishes,

Yours sincerely,

Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
Supernova from Experimentation
 
Last edited:
SUPERNOVA FROM PSYCHOBABBLE AT SCIFORUMS

Warning: responding to the mindless banter of Mr. Dixon could lead this thread to become a 'supertring' which could curl up once a critical mass is reached thereby initiating a supernova type 1a Denial of service attack on the server The IP-packet radiation will send a EMP pulse throught the whole internet, effectively throwing us back to stone-age. Which is exactly the ultimate means of Mr. Dixon to stop the groundbreaking experiments at Fermi labs.

Already he has created a black hole of psychobabble which sucks up the intellectual energy of great membersminds like CRISP and PLATO , who with all due respect (biertje?) are a bit pathological like Mr. Dixon in the sense that they persist explaining something to Mr. Dixon who DOES NOT WANT TO BE TEACHED in the first place.

As Mr. Dixon is a certified pscychobabblist in Hawaii it would be interisting to study his motives:

- Is he a member of the pacific liberation movement, trying to destabilize our culture by attempting to frustrate technological progress ?

- Just seeking attention in order to become famous like Erich von Daniken , selling books to make big bucks to the general public?

- Mr. Dixon's responses are really a artificial program like LISA in order to prove to fellow psychobabblists he can pass the Turing test


Anyway , I feel that there is a huge densitie of unguided energy here and I carefully suggest that some moderator lock this thread up in the babbletron and throw the key away.
:D
 
SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB

SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB

All friends, colleagues and efans: your efforts in this most tragic concern are most gratefully appreciated.

We may examine the historical precedent for this current crisis in the work of Johann Carl Fredrich Gauss, Janos Bolyai, Lobachevsky and Riemann. It was their contribution to shift the 2000 year adoration for Euclidean geometry to non-Euclidean geometry. The adoption of Riemannian, spherical geometry enabled Alber Einstein to develop the Generalized Theory of Relativity which then replaced the time-honoured work of Sir Issac Newton as the leading theory of gravitational forces. Willem de Sitter was able to generalize these equations to describe de Sitter space leading to those references cited in the first page of this thread. Where a potentially infinite number of universes may form in de Sitter space, we may also form a transition to this highly energetic condition at any point in the continuum by breaching the potential barrier towards de Sitter space thus releasing the force of a supernova upon our planet, solar system and a host of nearby stars.

The highly energetic condition of de Sitter space is well-known in this mainstream theory of derived from the work of Albert Einstein. Thus our universe is now termed the Einstein - de Sitter Universe in modern cosmology.

All best wishes and many thanks for your contributions. Recent work at Fermilab is at 9.16E30 (luminosity) at 2 TeV. This is more than one order of magnitude (times 10) greater than previous work at Fermilab.

All the children will thank you for your kind efforts on their behalf.

Every best wish!!!

Yours sincerely,

Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
Supernova from Experimentation
 
Human Being: Intelligent or Dumb creature?

Perhaps Paul is right... and I think that our scientists are hiding many of their discoveries from the public. If they really can act with this Sitter Space (which Paul says is where the universes are created, as I understood) they can probably create even more energy than a supernovae...
Sometimes it seams that the U.S. government is hidding many things from the public (some people even think that they have contact with the famous Zeta-Reticulian species called Greys who teaches them Super-Advenced Technologies). If this is true, why not create a supernovae in one laboratory? Of course they would have that stupid idea.
Once I read in an article from a Brasilian Magazine which talked about the plans to make a Black Hole in a laboratory in New York!!! What a stupid idea!! Perhaps the Greys gave them that idea and want to conquer the world... :D And them, with their stupidity (this don't include you, Paul. You seem to be conscient about the danger of this kind of experiment) they would say: Allright, we do it!.... DUHHHHHH!!!! :bugeye:
Whatever... being right or not, this discussion amuses me. I think we, as human beings, as "intelligent" creatures (enough to destroy ourselves) are already dumb enough. We don't need to come back to our Pre-History...
We MUST decide what is more important for us: our childish search for knowledge or our lives and the lives of those who we Love.
Anyways... better watch what is going on in our scientific world before we turn into melted dust...

Blessings,
Nelson
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top