Supernova From Experimentation At Fermilab

WellCookedFetus: First, I do not agree with Paul.

Second, he is talking aboout energy densities or some such concept, not total energy. An ounce of gold is many times more dense than a pillow full of feathers weighing a pound or so.

I do not know the peak energy density of a nuclear bomb, but it might be less than the peak energy density at Fermilabs.
 
That is not my problem, I am stating that his numbers do not add up to anything logical, try it your self according him fermilabs labs is putting out many times more energy then the impact that created the moon, that is pure raw energy no matter if it was focused on a nm space it would have blown the earth up!

start with 103.43*10^41 eV convert to Joules (1.60217646*10^-19 joules per eV), then to Joules per Kg of TNT (4.2*10^6 joules per Kg TNT) and then metric tons, Kilotons, megatons, ect. For reference the impact that created the moon was 6.5*10^7 Mt in explosive force.
 
SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB

Many thanks for your prompt actions in this most tragic concern.

Please review the article from the most prestigious journal, Nature, by Malcolm J. Perry. This article is entitled, Quantum tunnelling towards an exploding Universe? (Nature, 1986, 320, p.679). In this work, it is noted that a transtion from the continuum to de Sitter space as exemplars of different solutions is forbidden by the existence of a large potential barrier. The penetrance through a potential barrier in a classical sense is only a function of kinetic energy. The question is then whether energies that approximate those found at the point origin of the universe, whose source for quotation is the Accelerator Update of Fermilab, will breach the potential barrier towards de Sitter space thus releasing the force of a Type Ia Supernova.

We are thus faced with billions dollars of our tax money being spent to test
the hypothesis from General Relativity that such a potential barrier breach will release the force of a Supernova. Please computer model this event to
assess the likelihood of this transition toward de Sitter space.

All the children will thank you for your prompt efforts on their behalf and may the good God have mercy on our souls. Contact your members of Congress to prevent this imprudent plunge towards sudden death!

ALL BEST WISHES,

Yours sincerely,

Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
Supernova from Experimentation
 
Last edited:
SUPRERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB

Many thanks to eveyone for your prompt actions in this most tragic concern.

Please note the Tevatron Luminosity in the Fermi National Accelerator
Webpage. This in now cited as TEV 1.8 in contrast to the former value of
TEV 1.2. The integrated luminosity has increased from the 1989 value of .32 value to the value of 103E30. Also we may note that bunch spacing in nanoseconds has decreased from the 1989 value of 3500 nsec to 132 nsec, with the interactions/crossing going from the 1989 value of 0.25 to 9.13. Clearly these enormous increases are a gigantic, foolhardy plunge into the unknown which will destroy us all. These latter values are the oscillatory properties of the ongoing experment which under these postulations form a kind of key allowing for the formation of a transition towards de Sitter space. These values are only those of the preliminary part of the now ongoing Run II at Fermilab.

We are now at the 11th hour. They will now, "Fire up the Tevatron," using the Main Injector to stack the Tevatron bringing it to the those vast energy
levels noted above and those beyond in the second portion of Run II starting soon.

Please contact the members of Congress to ask for a halt to funding for this most gravely irresponsible action in this highest-energy physics experiment at Fermilab.

All the children will thank you for your prompt actions on their behalf and may the good God preserve us.

ALL BEST WISHES

Yours sincerely,

Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
Supernova from Experimentation
 
Last edited:
Paul:
I am still waiting for a reply to the three questions posted 9-13-04 so I post again: (two can play the repeat-post game). I also note that WCF has shown your numbers totally wrong (at least last time I looked Earth had not been totally destroyed).

1) Why energy densities, much higher than ANL can make, concentrated in a single primary cosmic ray, have not long ago punched a hole in the barrier to supernova?

2) Why the extreme supernova producing energies on the other side of the de Sitter barrier don't punch through to us?

3) Why a Ph.D. psychologist, rather than physicist, is so worried? (Even “selfish” ANL scientists don't want to be part of a supernova.)

If you had any facts, you would try to answer at least one!
 
We are now at the 11th hour.

That's strange - I thought we were at the 11th hour when you started this thread almost 4 years ago.

Have you some idea when exactly we'll reach the final hour? minute? second?
 
Well, the only thing Paul has is a PhD in the lack of any meaningful knowledge of physics. His repeated nonsensical posts are very compelling.
 
Krill said:
Well, the only thing Paul has is a PhD in the lack of any meaningful knowledge of physics. His repeated nonsensical posts are very compelling.
Click to expand...

Old joke seems to apply to Paul's repeated posts of same s...

BS = bull shit
MS = more shit
Ph. D. = Pilled higher and deeper
 
SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB

Many thanks to everyone for your most prompt actions in this tragic concern.

An important finding in support of the General Theory of Relativity has been brough forward by NASA. This has been termed "frame-dragging." The passage of the earth has been shown to distort the structure of space-time thus confirming one of the central tenets of the General Theory of Relativity which differentiates Einsteinian Physics from that of Sir Issac Newton. Gravitational effects are thus found to alter the space-time geometry to a Riemannian metric. A direct observation of this nature is thus primary evidence for those theoretical perspectives fundamental to the transition towards modern physics from the classical form of the Newtonian paradigm. (Guy Gugliotta, Theory of Relativity Evidence Found, Washington Post, Friday, October 22, 2004; Page A03)

Further evidence in support of the extension of the General Theory of Relativity would be a result of the ongoing test of the Standard Model of
highest-energy physics. This has now come to the threshold for the electroweak force to return to the general ylem of space-time energy as the energies proceed from the minus 9 to the minus 15 second interval prior to the Big Bang, point origin of the universe. The energy density is therefore that found within the one second interval subsequent to the conditions of infinite energy density found at this point of singularity at the beginning of the Universe under these general postulations. These energies should provide for the transition towards de Sitter space thus creating a Type Ia Supernova and also providing for additional observational confimation of the General Theory of Relativity. Please research these theoretical postulations with a senior member of the Physics Faculty of any major University.

From an historical perspective, we should continue with this dialogue until that final moment of deflagration of our Type Ia Supernova showing that members of our species were at least aware of what fate lay in store for us. Please contact members of the United States Congress to plead for halt to the funding for this final plunge into the unknown killing us all.

All the children will thank you for your prompt actions on their behalf and may the good God have mercy on our souls.

AL BEST WISHES

Yours sincerely,

Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
Supernova from Experimentation
 
Last edited:
Paul, you better post more. The UniKEF thread is talking to itself more than this one now.
 
It is absolutely amazing we haven't been toasted already. Fermilab jacks up the power by less than ten-fold and now we can create supernova and destroy all life within light years. Is that what lead to the demise of the Neanderthal? Did they fail to take into account that clacking extra large chunks of flint together might result in a nuclear detonation?
 
Er, Dr Dixon, may I inquire what university confers a PhD in 'Supernova from Experimentation'? I would guess you barely achieved a BS degree.
 
SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT FERMILAB

Many thanks to everyone for your prompt actions in this most tragic concern.

If physics was still philosophically based as it was during the the time of Aristotle, then it would not be an empirically based science needing experimentation for the verification of its hypotheses. The highest-energy physics experimentation at Fermilab is testing two dominant paradigms in modern physics. These energies now employed which are essentially equivalent to those found at the point origin of the Universe at the Big Bang are great enough to discover the fundamental building blocks of nature such as quarks, gluons and the Higgs particle. These energy densities are also great enough to enter into the realm of the cosmology of General Theory of Relativity and its extension by Willem de Sitter in the Einstein de Sitter Universe as it is now termed. A transtion may then be formed toward de Sitter Space thus releasing the force of a Type Ia Supernova under this postulation. This will then provide for experimental verification of the postulations of Albert Einstein and Willem de Sitter. Alas, this will be the final verification of their work since this will be the final experiment.

All the children will thank you for your prompt actions in contacting your members of Congress to bring a halt to this experimental plunge into the unknown and may the good God have mercy on our souls.

ALL BEST WISHES!!!

Yours sincerely,

Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
Supernova from Experimentation
 
Last edited:
Please contact members of the United States Congress to plead for halt to the funding for this final plunge into the unknown killing us all.
Click to expand...
It might be more appropriate to seek funding for theoretical research into this issue... You could sponsor some research yourself.
 
Its a wonder we haven't been toasted already. Cosmic rays that are thousands of times more energetic than anything LHC even dreamt of strike the earth every day.
 
Given enough time, a bunch of monkeys and typewriters would produce the complete works of shakespaere
 
Krill said:
Is that what lead to the demise of the Neanderthal? Did they fail to take into account that clacking extra large chunks of flint together might result in a nuclear detonation?
Click to expand...

Nice. :D
 
Something good will come out of this thread, the 30.000th post and a nomination for the Guiness Book of Records "longest thread" is well within our reach.....Keep up the good work!
 
that 30,000 views, less then 800 posts, we even have longer threads then that here on sciforums. This thread is just a paid kook ad from Paul, nothing more, nothing less.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top