Statutory rape

Word.

I couldn't agree more. Boys and girls have very different attitudes to sex. Girls have a far more emotional attitude towards it, whereas boys just have a boner they want to get rid of.

I had a huge crush on my teacher when I was 13, and would have jumped at the chance to get jiggy with her, and no, it would not have given me emotional scars.

What if the boy's gay? Should a female teacher still get a lighter sentence?
 
i was just going to say that anti-flag

Take the same teenager (who for argument sake happens to be bi)

2 of his teachers sleep with him, one male the other female.

Who goes to prision?
 
I agree with Asguard. It's just as wrong when it's a woman and an underage male.

Girls have a far more emotional attitude towards it

I am so sick of hearing that. Men fuck, women fall in love. Ngh.
 
You have 3 pages of thread, read it...It has been already explained...

By the way, depending on the "rapist's" age compared to the "raped" age, there are 3 categories:

Let's say the girl is 15:

1. Boy is younger or same as the girl. usually no punishment.
2. Boy is sligthly older (max. 2-3 years) than the girl. I think it is only a felony.
3. Man is much older. Statutory rape.

There is a reason behind this, I let you guys figure out what it is....
 
Isnt it interesting that the only person saying its right for different sentances is
a) the same person claiming that guys who get beaten up by there wifes are cowards
b) the same person who claims that guys who call the police for domestic vilonce arnt real men
b) a man (i think)

The women on here who actually know about female sexual urges are saying that there is no difference in the crime
 
Isnt it interesting that the only person saying its right for different sentances is
a) the same person claiming that guys who get beaten up by there wifes are cowards
b) the same person who claims that guys who call the police for domestic vilonce arnt real men
b) a man (i think)

The women on here who actually know about female sexual urges are saying that there is no difference in the crime

thats because me asgaurd there is no differance, they both had sex with a minor, and they both deserve punishment, and for the record guys who get beaten by they're wifes are not cowards!

domestic violence is a worldwide problem from men to women, women to men, if you egt beaten by your other half then you need toget out of there regardless of sex.
 
2. Boy is sligthly older (max. 2-3 years) than the girl. I think it is only a felony.

Why??!!

If it was a 30 year old and a 13 year old, yes, that's wrong, because it's so unequal.

But a 15 year old and, say, a 17 year old? Where is the crime there, where??!!
 
i agree with you, i just thought it was an interesting observation. You really dont need to convince me that women want sex:p

I grew up with 2 sisters and one brother and my partner has a larger sex drive than i do (by a country mile):p

i just thought it was facinating that apart from myself, of the people who have stuck to the origional topic (umm not sure what tiassa's post was arguing) all have been female arguing that the crimes are identical and the main person arguing they are different was a male.
 
Why??!!

If it was a 30 year old and a 13 year old, yes, that's wrong, because it's so unequal.

But a 15 year old and, say, a 17 year old? Where is the crime there, where??!!

because in UK she will be underage, that is statatory rape! and a crime, anyway the perants can have the man arrested!

the age of concent is there for a reason, to protect the innocent, and regardless of what anyone says no one is ready for a sexual relationship until they are after 16yrs old, some people even think that 16yrs is to young!!
 
because in UK she will be underage, that is statatory rape! and a crime, anyway the perants can have the man arrested!

the age of concent is there for a reason, to protect the innocent, and regardless of what anyone says no one is ready for a sexual relationship until they are after 16yrs old, some people even think that 16yrs is to young!!

I think so long as you are not still a child, a sexual relationship with someone of similar age is fine.

The age of consent varies according to what country you live in. Is it wrong to have sex at 14 in one country where the age of consent is 16, but not wrong in one where it is 14?
 
I think so long as you are not still a child, a sexual relationship with someone of similar age is fine.

The age of consent varies according to what country you live in. Is it wrong to have sex at 14 in one country where the age of consent is 16, but not wrong in one where it is 14?

differant laws for differant places, i guess!!
 
in victoria below 10 any person having sexual contact is guilty of carnal knowlage of a minor under 10 (including OTHER under 10 year olds though in these cases they mainly look for other abuse because its belived that 10 year olds and below wouldnt do this of there own accord)

Between 10 and 16 if you are within 2 years you cant be charged but above that you are guilty of carnal knowlage of a minor between 10 and 16 (carnal knowlage of a minor is the legal name for stat rape)

Above 16 anyone but someone with control over the person (teacher, step parent ect) can have sex with them

Above 18 anyone can have sex, excepting a doctor or mental health proffessional who is treating the person or a relitive closer than 2nd cousin
 
Back
Top