Science is not yet absolute & final. So for yet pending understandings, we may need to apply logic as possibilty for future understanding in science when it will be absolute.
Spritual Terms defined?
- Thread starter KUMAR5
- Start date
Ok sorry. Tell me, what can be the nature's meaning to create life?"Nature should......"
Now your arrogant enough to proclaim what Nature should.....?????
Look up the word
ANTHROPOMORPHISM
You appear to have a severe case, along with
no idea about biology
no idea about anything you are seeking to define
no idea of how to express whatever point you are trying to convey
As long as you remain bereft of the above understandings you are no help to yourself and a irritation to others
And to answer your question bluntly
nature is a process not a entity
nature did not create life (neither did god or a supernatural being of any sort)
physics created the whole of the Universe
there is absolutely NO meaning to life
no grand design
no grand plan
no god looking after the fine-tuned Universe (it's not)
I need coffee
Last edited:
I feel, you need to be positive about me as I feel, I presented best logical definitions which may give you a better or ultimate idea about universal sprituality. You may also relate these universely with everything even to true science and true religion. Try to grow fruit trees by fruit seeds. I can not do more. Best luck.Look up the word
ANTHROPOMORPHISM
You appear to have a severe case, along with
no idea about biology
no idea about anything you are seeking to define
no idea of how to express whatever point you are trying to convey
As long as you remain bereft of the above understandings you are no help to yourself and a irritation to others
P. S. Pls tell me about fine tuned universe. Yes nature is a process but it is commonly said as an entity for better understanding.
Last edited:
It's hard to be positive when I spend time trying to give you positive advice and you ignore it and repeat the crap you have been rabbiting on about throughout the thread
Did you even attempt to look up
ANTHROPOMORPHISM?
No
There are not enough 1 or 2 syllable words which can explain such a complex concept to dumb it down to your level of comprehension
And there is no crayon font which would be suitable to use with a 1 or 2 syllable explanation
Yes, then,?It's hard to be positive when I spend time trying to give you positive advice and you ignore it and repeat the crap you have been rabbiting on about throughout the thread
Did you even attempt to look up
ANTHROPOMORPHISM?
Ok, I shall see myself.No
There are not enough 1 or 2 syllable words which can explain such a complex concept to dumb it down to your level of comprehension
And there is no crayon font which would be suitable to use with a 1 or 2 syllable explanation
Seattle
Valued Senior Member
Care to explain the "fully ripened fruits" exclusion to your theory?
No dude, science doesn't work that way. There is no absolute and final conclusion in science.
Do you understand what it MEANS? Particular what it means in reference to the nonsense you are posting here? Explain to me if you wish how ANTHROPOMORPHISM relates to your thinking
Good. When you have seen for yourself again, if you wish, explain back to others and myself what you understand and if you do not understand ask questions instead of just making flat out nonsensical statements
I doubt that will be forthcoming
I think by now it should be clear we are not in the realm of science but in "the glory glory hallelujah to the perfect god" post (zip) code arrived at by the power of KUMAR5 logical thinking (which as all the other posters in thread know is anything but logical)
My own idea (outside the box guess) someone is trying out a primative AI program and we are the guinea pig responders
Anyone else get such a vibe?
DaveC426913
Valued Senior Member
Wow.
OK. This is what is called 'begging the question'. You are assuming - as the premise of your argument - that animals exist for a purpose. You then go on the conclude what that purpose might be.
The study of nature and evolution has shown us that these things do not happen for a "purpose". Life is an emergent product of the chemistry of the universe.
The problem here, is that you are not being objective. You are assuming some sort of god who created things for his own reasons. You will inescapably reach faulty conclusions if you make this assumption.
Science - almost by definition - can never be absolute or final.
Apart from the absolute bit (see above) I agree, we need to apply logic.
Unfortunately you appear to be incapable of recognising logic, let alone applying it.
Which fall by itself after ripening.
We are talking about spirituals not yet non absolute science. Yes we can base a&f science.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fine-tuned_UniverseDo you understand what it MEANS? Particular what it means in reference to the nonsense you are posting here? Explain to me if you wish how ANTHROPOMORPHISM relates to your thinking
Good. When you have seen for yourself again, if you wish, explain back to others and myself what you understand and if you do not understand ask questions instead of just making flat out nonsensical statements
I doubt that will be forthcoming
I think by now it should be clear we are not in the realm of science but in "the glory glory hallelujah to the perfect god" post (zip) code arrived at by the power of KUMAR5 logical thinking (which as all the other posters in thread know is anything but logical)
My own idea (outside the box guess) someone is trying out a primative AI program and we are the guinea pig responders
Anyone else get such a vibe?
ANTHROPOMORPHISM : I do not make base of man made terms in their interests.
Try o look positive side to get and give.
Are you claiming that live beings have been created with a sole purpose, to be killed intentionally by creater(whoever may be)? Like fruit pulp.
Forget human's personal interests. Apply logic with equanimity on yet not known and on non a&f part of science understandings and then post. Try to get by definitions given, by positive attitude not by hypnotized preception. It is not possible, one is best or omniscient. Other can also be better in some.
Pure unadulterated nonsense.
You persist in claiming that your wishful thinking is logic yet your only recourse when called on it is to exhort respondents to "apply logic with equanimity" - if you actually had any logic you'd be able to lay it out step by step.
Absolute crap.
Off to the ignore list for you: you're not not only illogical but tedious with it.
Either the battery is running down or some of the logic gates have been welded shut
Goodnight Gracie