ok this is in error, it assumes that she believes exactly as you define religion to be, not as she believes , although odds are you are correct, as history has showed that she is more mainstream than I, but still to assume she believes as you would define it, instead of asking her for confirmation first, is in error.
it is the same as saying "if God exist then he would <insert wish here>" .
most church goers are 'do as your told' they do not want to think for themselves, they are happy and content living with someone telling them what to do/believe, that way they feel they do not have to take responsibility for their actions(regardless of them having to be responsible for their actions) I have argued with Christians, same as I argue here, most end up getting offended and shutting me down, (big clue as to how much they understand, or how strong their faith is) but once in awhile I would end up with one that did know what he was talking about, their faith was 100 times stronger than the ones who get offended, I have learned much from them.
now when I see that 'do as you told' mentality, I get offended, (there is not much that offends me) their faith is not strong, if all it takes is some strategic questions for them to feel doubt about their faith, then they aint worth listening to.
so I test them to see if they are worthy of listening to, if they default to 'because the bible says so' then they don't understand and nothing they say can help me understand.
and there is a difference between believing in God and believing in religion, the faithful (as described above) tend to be closer to God and have answers worthy of acceptance, the others are just religious drones.