I live, currently, with Buddhists from Thailand.
Thai culture is based on a society, actually a kingdom, going back thousands of years.
Their political system is based on a monotheistic monarchical "democracy", but the Western paradigm starts and ends with the idea of sovereignty; the king and his ancestry are considered divine; the king is the ultimate arbiter and his advice or guidance is considered to be divinely inspired, and so the king "rules" the country largely by fiat. He rules with a more or less velvet glove, with ritualistic acts of generosity and social benefit, but must, it seems, effectively be so, or at least appear munificent and good-hearted, while maintaining a suitable stature, and yet adhering to essential Buddhist doctrine. A good king is a Buddhist king.
It seems to have worked for Thailand, a small country with a lot of people. The cohesion is remarkable, given where it is, and the rival nations (Burma for example, an ancient enemy) surrounding it.
Even with a western facade of democracy, MPs, democratic elections, and so on, everyone defers to royalty because of the religious nature of that cohesion, which is far older and has meant a stable theocracy (the current sovereign is a descendant of a line that stretches back to the middle ages, like Elizabeth II).
Thai people are "open" to ideas external to their Buddhist upbringing, like Easter and Christmas (they celebrate Christmas and the Western New Year), but it's very difficult to give them advice, or overturn pretty much anything they believe (expecially if their Thai friends told them), about some detail of Western living, or social import.