...but even this is an acknowledgment on the inherent limitations of AI (machine intelligence) that can never be overcome.
People who say that certan thangs can never be overcom are constently bein proved rong.!!!
...but even this is an acknowledgment on the inherent limitations of AI (machine intelligence) that can never be overcome.
I guess in a ways we would have the most difficulty in emulating our "soul" or "ghost" whatever you want to call it.
There would be no way to actually measure or determine a machine's ability to recognize itself.
well some things are just not possible.
but now we are talking about capabilities. you can say it was evolution but was the capacity always present in humans to develop intellectual capacity we see today?
just like an ant, which relies on collective intelligence, so do humans.
you can argue that large networs do the same but faster does not provide the ability to learn and it in terms of computers\machines the network does not take away from the limitations whereas in organic intelligence it does. these are fundamental differences. so i stand by my original post, there is no comparison. we are talking about entirely separate methods here.
Are you suggestin that the intellectual capacity humans have was inevitable.???
!
realty does not require evidence.
perhaps i am wrong aobut this subject but the burden of proof is on you.
Nope, what that reality is often requires some investigation.realty does not require evidence.
many things effect the path we have taken. luck and circumstance amongst a few other things, including freedom of expression and freedom from persecution by fanatics but i am not saying it was inevitable. I am saying that it was always present...iow's the capacity was always there. its all about limitations.