I didn't ask for proof, I asked for evidence. I ask you again, what evidence is there? Either there is evidence that led you to make these assertions, or you just made them up. If you made them up, then we can safely ignore you and your assertions. If there was evidence that led you to these assertions then please share that evidence with us.
If it is not guesswork then I think you mean that these are well reasoned assertions. In that case please share the reasoning with us. For example, what leads you to believe there are two forces?
So you will have no problem in providing a citation for the work wherein scientists report this discovery. Please do so in your next post.
I've changed the word proof to evidence in my post.
My reasoning comes from a lifetime of interest in nature, but has only come together in the last few years after researching ancient concepts since 1994.
The fact that my comments are called crap, indicates to me that they are thinking straight, because I thought the same for many years.
I would be surprised if anyone agreed with me, and I have had to continuously question my newfound conclusions, and I still do.
However I now have, over two thousand illustrations in nature that seem to verify what I have discovered. By posting comments on various scientific topics, I distribute what may be picked up on through personal observation.
If nature and observation is "evidence," then it is important that perceptions are not shackled by intellectual codependency.
If "evidence" is the opinions of others, considered to be authorities, then their opinion is the limit under which one stays.
And yes, I do think and make up what I say.
In regards to the two forces, all my theories are based on the stuff that modern science has put into the superstitions section of the library. Things like the four elements, which are thought of as simplistic and stupid.
But, for example they represent the four basic extremes of the two aspects of the background forces of matter, by the formula AB, Ab, aB, ab.