Not according to Dr. Hare. They can only mimic empathetic emotion and form boundaries based on their overall goals, that's not the same as understanding boundaries as a rightful protection of another's space and being.
I suggest you take a look at this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zA9-RB3runE
well, some people need to experience something to get insight. perhaps you are that type or you won't believe it.
i don't know how many examples i will need to post before the narrow-minded fixation on one particular definition is believed to be the only truth according to "dr.hare".
sociopaths don't have feelings? i lived with one for most of my life so i think i should know more about it. experience over some guy who just probably interviewed some psychotic killers (they tend to be insane). sociopaths are not insane. i think i have more common sense insight.
it's unbelievable how people don't know this. sociopaths are some of the most highly emotional and touchy people that exist. it's just that their emotions tend to be self-serving or about their needs or wants with less consideration for others. this is not an accident, it's a value system. it's a dangerous thing to offend a sociopath as they tend to be very vindictive. oftentimes, you don't even need to offend them on purpose at all as their egos are so overbloated that they get offended easily anyways.
of course they understand boundaries (psychos may not) as well, it's just that they don't respect them when it gets in the way of what they want. they know it's not right but that isn't the point, it's about getting what they want. that's a very easy thing to understand.
my sociopath tortured me from the time i was a child in every way possible and every single day. they, however, did not do that to their own family, friends, or their own children. why would he? he cared for them. again, the basic difference between a sociopath and non is that the sociopath does not care to have a general sense of humanity. this stems from their narcissism so those who they identify most closely are the ones who they may extend the same rights as to themselves by respecting their boundaries but not to those who they see as 'prey'. not all sociopaths are the same and don't fit one particular profile.
let's use a past and well-known example. back in the day and especially slave-traders are sociopaths but that doesn't mean they didn't have a sense of emotions or care for those they chose to care for. even today, there are those who are trafficking humans. that doesn't mean those people don't have friends or family etc that they care for. sociopaths are not exactly like psycopaths (they fit more the definition of those who are insane and literally incapable of feeling empathy or distinguishing). psycopaths because they are insane tend to end up exposing themselves more readily. ironicly they are less guilty than sociopaths because they are totally insane. sociopaths are waaay more dangerous as they do understand emotions and manipulate people. they do things much more covertly and hide their tracks much better as they are better aware.
To empathize means 'co-feeling' to feel with another because you understand what that feeling is yourself.
on the contrary, one would learn a lot to listen to me on this subject as i've "lived" it, experienced it and seen first hand how sociopaths operate and even those who enable them. i could even write a book on the subject.
let me explain what you are missing. this is how a sociopath would deal with an emotion with another person they target as their prey. they do understand those feelings of the other person BUT they are not out to have 'co-feeling' or empathize with them. they are out to use it or to exploit it.
whereas, with those they care for, they are there to have 'co-feeling'.
again, again, again i cannot stress this point more is that sociopaths just don't abide by a general sense of ethics.