This is a faulty premise. Western religion is entirely derived from the East, having all but wiped out its own indigenous cultures with their silly myths and superstitions, only to replace them with the even more ridiculous myths and superstitions of the Middle East.
There is little, if any, direct link to the silliness of the Far East, which largely encompasses eternal cycles of reality.
And the silliness of the Middle East is a confused pot luck stew of regional myths and superstitions over a period of several thousands of years, when dynasties in the same region had their own particular forms of nonsense to replace the long lost foolishness of their ancestors.
Apocalypse, you will note, is a Greek word. Think about that. The Greeks did not even rise in importance until about 2300 years after the oldest bogosity was recorded.
The only thing you are harping on, which is the clear bias of this topic, is Christian fundamentalism, which is a very, very recent phenomenon, and which largely owes itself to the ignorance of 19th century American pioneers, who are perhaps the worst possible source of information about world history, cosmology and this zany fixation on the mangled idea of an apocalypse.
Check the "born on date" of the Christian apocalypse story. It's one of the most recent inventions of the vacuous orthodox literature being paraded by the fundies.
And did I say nutty. Oh, and don't forget frivolous.