What, did you read that in the bible or something? I'm sure it's easier to keep absurd ideas to yourself, their defense would require an aggravating amount of effort.
shreds...
- Thread starter scifes
- Start date
What, did you read that in the bible or something? I'm sure it's easier to keep absurd ideas to yourself, their defense would require an aggravating amount of effort.
hahaha... this is so funny. Mohammad invented zero too?
i've supplied it in silence.
i don't consider myself supported it, not yet.
i don't think you understand how a biased internet forum works.
debate means BS when it's one to ten.
how can i make this clearer to you?
when the avalanche of your insulting criticisem comes, there's only me with a shovel to take it back up, plowing it off to the other side is normally out of the question.
and so, when i lay still and do nothing about it all, ecause it's too much, what would be the observer's impression? is that fair?
all of it?
Then I think it would be better to address the claims with whatever underlying synthesis connects them simultaneously, or instead support each claim with whatever support it has. I don't consider them supported either, as presented.
Bollocks: I've taken on those odds and triumphed. It's simple: if there's some astounding support for your claims, present it. Otherwise, you will go on posting shreds and having them shredded. Don't blame me for your choice of forum either: you knew perfectly well what your response would be when you started this thread of shreds.
Now: How can I make this clearer to you?
wonder if anyone else can muster getting boldly cheap like that..In this thread? Yes...
reread post #27 and tell me if you still wanna go forward with this.
cuz i don't guarantee it'll end like your "yes" in the other thread..
clear enough, i don't have the time to unscrew this screwed up reality, so i'm requesting a ban till i do have the time, to do so, and start some screwing of my own..Then I think it would be better to address the claims with whatever underlying synthesis connects them simultaneously, or instead support each claim with whatever support it has. I don't consider them supported either, as presented.
Bollocks: I've taken on those odds and triumphed. It's simple: if there's some astounding support for your claims, present it. Otherwise, you will go on posting shreds and having them shredded. Don't blame me for your choice of forum either: you knew perfectly well what your response would be when you started this thread of shreds.
Now: How can I make this clearer to you?
It's already ended. You asserted some nonsense about the Quran detailing stuff impossible to know without modern scientific gear, and I pointed out that there's no such stuff in it.scifes said:
To repeat: nothing written, done, or created by humans in the course of human life and employing their human capabilities, is evidence of any deity. Humans are not gods.
It's funny, very funny.
It should be noted that bones do NOT develop BEFORE flesh. That is, "BONES" real bones, do not develop BEFORE flesh. They develop within the "flesh". This of course proves the Qur'an is full of it. BUT of I'm sure after Muslims are done twisting and turning and reinterpreting every which way they can suddenly this is "Miraculous and "Proof of God"
But what can you expect? I mean the Qur'an is mainly plagiarized stories from the Bible of course mixing in some plagerized work based on Greek Physicians fits well within it's modus operandi.
Oh, did you also know Arabic is the Perfect language, the Kabaa is the Gods very bary berry specialist playth on earth and Mohammad "invented" Zero.
It should be noted that bones do NOT develop BEFORE flesh. That is, "BONES" real bones, do not develop BEFORE flesh. They develop within the "flesh". This of course proves the Qur'an is full of it. BUT of I'm sure after Muslims are done twisting and turning and reinterpreting every which way they can suddenly this is "Miraculous and "Proof of God"
But what can you expect? I mean the Qur'an is mainly plagiarized stories from the Bible of course mixing in some plagerized work based on Greek Physicians fits well within it's modus operandi.
Oh, did you also know Arabic is the Perfect language, the Kabaa is the Gods very bary berry specialist playth on earth and Mohammad "invented" Zero.
This reminds me of that quirky argument a lot of Muslims seem to make: "Mohammed was a simple nomad, how could he have known of such things?". Beyond arguing over whether details of the Quran are even accurate or not, what is the logical grounds for assuming there even was a guy named Mohammed as described? Why are we supposed to take this for granted as if it were proven fact? The truth is, the Quran, like all other books, is a book. None of you, Muslim, Jew, atheist, etc., have any real idea who actually wrote it, nor when it was actually written/finalized.