DaveC426913
Valued Senior Member
I think the premises of the thread are that, given time and progress, it is inevitable thatI think bill is probably right. There won't be algorithms to determine who will I hit. There will be algorithms to determine how I can avoid an accident.
Human drivers don't think, "should I swerve into oncoming traffic or should I run over the little old lady on the sidewalk?" We swerve the direction our instincts take us and then say "Oh Shit!". There will probably be standard protocols, IF possible - stop! ELSE swerve in the direction that avoids oncoming traffic. (Left in remnants of the British Empire, right everywhere else in the world.)
1] there must be - will be - edge case accidents wherein someone's death ends up being unavoidable,
2] AI will have enough processing power and speed that it is has sufficient time and operability that it could, conceivably, have the opportunity where a choice could be made.
Sure it's an edge case, but this a science forum, where edge cases (such as relativistic speeds and black holes) are routinely discussed.
But more than an edge case, it's got to happen (again, given enough time and progress).