I'm trying to figure something out. I would appreciate some help on this one. Declarations of sexual orientation are not required, but I do admit they would be helpful.
And no, you don't have to number off your answers, or even answer everything. That's not the point. This topic stems from my curiosity in other topics regarding the ethics of hetero- and homosexuality. There is something quite obvious I do not understand about the ways my human neighbors on this planet view sexuality. Don't get me wrong, I think I'm not so abnormal for failing to understand the screw-a-virgin-to-cure-AIDS superstition, but certain discussions both recently and in the past, at Sciforums and elsewhere, leave me wondering if I haven't walked through the mirror and slipped into the crack.
I almost can't describe the personal value of sexual intercourse in my perspective. It goes well beyond orgasms, to be sure. There is a state of love and trust that brings tremendous comfort physical, emotional, and spiritual. I prefer exclusivity if my partner and I exercise a pretense of stability, and find it odd that men who want non-exclusive relationships are often considered perverts, while men who don't want them are apparently possessive. Nonetheless, I know at least one stable and reasonably-successful non-exclusive relationship, and both are very intelligent people. Their kids are happy and don't seem aware of either sex or the diversity of partners their parents experience. I'm not unsettled by the idea. Consent is paramount in my book; I'm not averse to the idea of perversion if both partners consent to it--my own rule is simple: no children, animals, or dead organisms; beyond that, I can probably be persuaded to try any number of things. There is such a thing as "bad sex"; beyond consent, both partners actually have to be into it. If one partner is entirely focused on the self, the result is often bad sex. And yes, I have a perverse side, and whether it is mild or severe probably depends on the person perceiving it. I must admit that I literally cannot remember my last sex with another male, and yes, I still climb the walls with cock-desire from time to time; it almost seems, believe it or not, a lunar cycle. As to aesthetics, it depends on your sense of aesthetics. Fat-bottomed girls do make the rockin' world go 'round, and I think the oldest I've been with was in her fifties when I was about twenty-five. I do not consider myself statistically-normal, but it is more important to me to be human than normal. And, hopefully, it is quite obvious that I take these questions seriously.
As to the ethics and morals of it all, I think the topic itself will tell.
Thank ye, good luck, and enjoy.
(1) What personal value does sexual intercourse have for you?
(2) How do you view stable, exclusive sexual relationships?
(3) How do you view stable, non-exclusive sexual relationships?
(4) How important to you is your partner's consent to sexual participation?
(5) Is there such thing as good or bad sex (quality of experience)?
(6) Is there such thing as kinky or perverse sex (nature of activity)?
(7) Are you willing to disclose the range of your sexual partners (gender, species, age, attributes)?
(8) How important are physical aesthetics to your sexual arousal?
(9) Do you consider yourself "normal"?
(10) Are you capable of taking these questions seriously, and are you willing to give them serious consideration?
(2) How do you view stable, exclusive sexual relationships?
(3) How do you view stable, non-exclusive sexual relationships?
(4) How important to you is your partner's consent to sexual participation?
(5) Is there such thing as good or bad sex (quality of experience)?
(6) Is there such thing as kinky or perverse sex (nature of activity)?
(7) Are you willing to disclose the range of your sexual partners (gender, species, age, attributes)?
(8) How important are physical aesthetics to your sexual arousal?
(9) Do you consider yourself "normal"?
(10) Are you capable of taking these questions seriously, and are you willing to give them serious consideration?
And no, you don't have to number off your answers, or even answer everything. That's not the point. This topic stems from my curiosity in other topics regarding the ethics of hetero- and homosexuality. There is something quite obvious I do not understand about the ways my human neighbors on this planet view sexuality. Don't get me wrong, I think I'm not so abnormal for failing to understand the screw-a-virgin-to-cure-AIDS superstition, but certain discussions both recently and in the past, at Sciforums and elsewhere, leave me wondering if I haven't walked through the mirror and slipped into the crack.
I almost can't describe the personal value of sexual intercourse in my perspective. It goes well beyond orgasms, to be sure. There is a state of love and trust that brings tremendous comfort physical, emotional, and spiritual. I prefer exclusivity if my partner and I exercise a pretense of stability, and find it odd that men who want non-exclusive relationships are often considered perverts, while men who don't want them are apparently possessive. Nonetheless, I know at least one stable and reasonably-successful non-exclusive relationship, and both are very intelligent people. Their kids are happy and don't seem aware of either sex or the diversity of partners their parents experience. I'm not unsettled by the idea. Consent is paramount in my book; I'm not averse to the idea of perversion if both partners consent to it--my own rule is simple: no children, animals, or dead organisms; beyond that, I can probably be persuaded to try any number of things. There is such a thing as "bad sex"; beyond consent, both partners actually have to be into it. If one partner is entirely focused on the self, the result is often bad sex. And yes, I have a perverse side, and whether it is mild or severe probably depends on the person perceiving it. I must admit that I literally cannot remember my last sex with another male, and yes, I still climb the walls with cock-desire from time to time; it almost seems, believe it or not, a lunar cycle. As to aesthetics, it depends on your sense of aesthetics. Fat-bottomed girls do make the rockin' world go 'round, and I think the oldest I've been with was in her fifties when I was about twenty-five. I do not consider myself statistically-normal, but it is more important to me to be human than normal. And, hopefully, it is quite obvious that I take these questions seriously.
As to the ethics and morals of it all, I think the topic itself will tell.
Thank ye, good luck, and enjoy.
