Or it's an allergic reaction to a new shirt that should have been washed. I would hardly say you have necessarily have an illness. And once you move over into the realm of mental illnesses you are talking longer term than a single outbreak of hives. You haven't even made it into neurosis with a perturbation - never used this word so much before, rather fun.This is where we disagree. Yes people can be healthy physically. Mild perturbations also indicate distress. If I develop hives on otherwise normal skin, it is an illness in the broadest sense of the term. It's something that upsets the status quo, which in this case is skin not adversely affected. Mental health is no different.
Perturbations, however, can be experienced in reaction to promotions, deaths in the family, meeting someone attractive, giving a public speech and people can experience perturbations, even 'freak out' to be slangy, and not remotely be diagnosible as having a mental illness. Disagree away, but it's my area of expertise and your hypothesis does not match professional practice.
People not in the business of diagnosing often think that 'wrong' beliefs can lead easily to diagnosis. Nope. And, again, religious and spiritual beliefs are actually being met much more flexibly, by even the psychiatric community, than they were 20 and certain 50 years ago.
If you are a neuropsychopharmacologist you should talk to fellow professionals, the one's dealing directly with those who might or might not be diagnosed, and ask them what it takes to get a diagnosis.
And, if you are one, Neuropharmo, or the like, might be a better abbreviation than psychotic episode, given that length was your criterion.
But perhaps others will weigh in on this issue.
We seem to have reached our impasse.
Last edited: