Search for Dark Matter

Pinball1970

Valued Senior Member
T.I.L. LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) looking for Dark matter.

Results (280 days worth of data) presented in conferences this month.

article here https://phys.org/news/2024-08-dark.html

From the article: "LZ uses 10 tons of liquid xenon to provide a dense, transparent material for dark matter particles to potentially bump into. The hope is for a WIMP to knock into a xenon nucleus, causing it to move, much like a hit from a cue ball in a game of pool. By collecting the light and electrons emitted during interactions, LZ captures potential WIMP signals alongside other data."
 
It might be turn out to be illusive. Jury is out on that at the moment. :)
 
e·lu·sive
/əˈlo͞osiv/
adjective

  1. difficult to find, catch, or achieve.
Yes. That is what I think they meant. The solution to DM is difficult to find, catch or achieve.

But I can't deny that illusive also works:

illusive: having the nature of something unreal or deceptive.
 
Has anyone ever tried to reverse the idea that the space between galaxies is expanding, by assuming that it is instead the distance between particles that is contracting? This explains the acceleration of the redshift, and I think it also explains the anomaly in the rotation speed of galaxies.
 
Has anyone ever tried to reverse the idea that the space between galaxies is expanding, by assuming that it is instead the distance between particles that is contracting? This explains the acceleration of the redshift, and I think it also explains the anomaly in the rotation speed of galaxies.
Makes no sense. The expansion has been measured. No shrinkage found. Not even close to explaining anything.
 
Has anyone ever tried to reverse the idea that the space between galaxies is expanding, by assuming that it is instead the distance between particles that is contracting? This explains the acceleration of the redshift, and I think it also explains the anomaly in the rotation speed of galaxies.
Yes, this has been thought of. It falls apart for the same reason many such ideas do:
  • there are no observations that suggest this idea is explanatory,
  • it has no mathematical or theoretical basis,
  • it poses more questions than it answers,
  • it makes no predictions we can test - i.e. even if it were true, how could we tell?
 
Back
Top