Bishadi Netayahu doesn't believe it to be the rightful property of Israel, you idiot.
then a head of state has no business dealing in personal property.
It is however a significant part of Jewish history and he would like to see it given to Israel to add it to the historical collection,
Of arabic documents? What history is there when nothing of the state even existed when any of the material was written? The material is religious and literary (books) collected by Russian people, within Russia. Netayahu is a Russian himself that believes in judaism; nothing more, historically.
as it stands it's sitting away doing no service.
can you show something about these manuscripts? (basically what the OP was inquiring on)
It is "seized property", because it was "Seized" and stolen from Jews who lived in Russia at one time at another.
Lots of stuff 'seized' during war. How do you think Israel even exists? Point being, where is the line drawn; if Russia 'seized' property that was collected by Russians, then why would Russia give it to people who seized the land they standing on,, when nothing in the collection has anything to do with the Russian who is governing the land under the new name called Israel?
It is like telling the queen of england, 'we migrated to america but we want the clock tower as my ggggreat grand daddy built it."
You're acting as if Netanyahu said; "They stole it from Israel and we want it back". He didn't.
And since the governing party of Israel is asking the governing party of Russia for the manuscripts i call it foul to include heads of state for property that has nothing to do with 'state'.
Since this isn't an Israel-Palestine debate, I would like it if you can keep your rhetoric straight...but can you? Are you capable? We'll soon see....
Since this is not a religious or political debate, then no religious preference or belief should be included. That means; just because the material is old religious writings does not mean, it is the belief that the people are jewish when they born russian, does not make their belief supercede their birth and country of origin. They can believe what they want, but reality is Russian's collected and Russian's seized and Russian's own the literature. No other country has a right to ask for it because the leader believes he is related to the documentation by faith.
The opening post was inquiring on the manuscripts, what's in them and who is aware of the documentation.
In that OP it shares the people who collected the material were RUSSIAN.
That is all that is really significant to the context of me laughing at the idea that a government leader could ask another government to give them property that was in the originating country before the new one was even born.
You really do not see either the validity of the inquiry or the laughing matter of the opening post.
Whats in the manuscripts?
Have you ever read up on what Isaac Newton wrote about the middle east?
I wonder if any of the old RUSSIAN collections have any of that in it too along with the 'arabic' material, perhaps talking about the arabs of palestine.
i wonder if there is a geneology all the way back to moses, sharing the census bureau of the birth of moses; born in Egypt, an african!
oh yea, thats in Deuteronomy, so anyone can see that Moses himself was born, raised and educated in egypt (pharoahs house)
Does that mean since he supposedly wrote torah, that technically judaism is an african religion?
IS africa truly what is real(y) their homeland; then maybe the science of mankinds evolution does fit the bible. (isn't first man from africa?)
I will ask any who are half way intelligent; is bloodline and birth what is real or belief?
Was sammy davis jr jewish?
