Laika said:I realise that it wasn't btsimah who started the topic, but isn't it more likely that the "brick" in the locked 'PROOF of MARTIAN CIVILIZATION' thread is a ventifact? Such angular rocks are very common on Mars.
Laika said:Would you have NASA stop to examine every rock they encountered that had a flat surface?
SkinWalker said:Who gets to define "interesting?" To the uneducated eye, the forms you see might be "interesting," to the experienced and educated eye, they're simply rocks. Perhaps the people at NASA, JPL, and others know what they're doing.
Then again, you could always: 1) get a job there and show them where they're wrong; 2) write a paper and submit it to a peer-reviewed journal and show them where they're wrong.
Because rocks can not be naturally flat.btimsah said:A flat rock, that could be the greatest discovery SHOULD be interesting to everyone. However, due to the argumentative war between those interested in finding the truth about ETI from such an image and those who don't - we don't get anywhere.
btimsah, for the umpteenth time, when the 'structures' you see are perfectly natural structures, what else are we meant to think. Where and when did you derive the notion that you can't have flat rocks. If you really believe this then you are displaying your ignorance to the world.btimsah said:I've figured out that some simply do not believe in using "structures" to verify that alien intelligence exists or existed.
Let's break this down:btimsah said:Tell someone there are ancient alien structures, and look at their reaction.
SkinWalker said:Let me re-phrase: You see structures that those trained to look at images in NASA, JPL, and university geology/astronomy departments all over the world don't see.
Show me which of these trained/educated experts see what you see.