SAM:
You should know by now how it works. When James is offended we get irrational warnings and bans. When we are offended its because there is something wrong with our beliefs.
Do you find the clip offensive, SAM?
If so, please tell me what offends you about it.
I asked the same question of Baron Max, but have had no reply.
Incognito:
If human beings are so adept at determining right from wrong, why does there exist an exception in law that diminishes the extent of a crime based upon mental capacity at time the crime is committed.
Well, where I live that particular law has been abolished due to its overuse and abuse. But never mind.
Another example would be the insanity plea, I suppose. The general principle is that you can't be held criminally responsible for actions that you do not consciously intend, or actions done when you are mentally ill. The presumption is that under such circumstances you do not have the capacity for normal moral reasoning.
Remind me again about how this has any relation to the film clip I posted.
It is you who is interpreting from the video that mankind's mental capacity is so evolved to where good and evil are completely obvious choices, and that every man sees and can decide their actions accordingly. Don't reply back with some mindless response such as, Ah didunt say or think dat. Because you know better.
I didn't actually comment on the clip at all, apart from to ask the question of whether right and wrong are determined by God. What do you think about that?
I'll thank you not to tell me what I think, too. If you want to know what I think about something, try asking me.
What did you think of the video?
Watched it halfway through. I found it funny until the long bit of sarcastic dialogue. I would have continued to find it funny, but it disappointingly delved into blatant propaganda.
Did it offend your religious beliefs?