spidergoat, for such personal interactions, PMs are available.
It just seems, to me, a little rude to request in a public space that everyone else avoids the discussion. It is self defacing.
It's like whispering in a crowded room. It invites queries as to the nature of the whisper.
spidergoat wrote...
Good arguments though.
spidergoat wrote...
But if I wanted to know what people thought of toffee, I wouldn't ban those who didn't like toffee from my enquiry.
It just seems, to me, a little rude to request in a public space that everyone else avoids the discussion. It is self defacing.
It's like whispering in a crowded room. It invites queries as to the nature of the whisper.
spidergoat wrote...
What... the members or the rules?They are experimental in nature.
Good arguments though.
spidergoat wrote...
If I wanted to know about sun spots, I wouldn't include data about campaign finance reform, would I?
But if I wanted to know what people thought of toffee, I wouldn't ban those who didn't like toffee from my enquiry.
Last edited: