OK. I get it. With the exception of the thread starter and a very few other participants, noone (see it, AN? has actually read the theory starter's book.
So you gaggle of arguers are self admittedly woefully ignorant of the theory inventor's own ideas as evidenced by his own written words. You are like a little puppy dog who blissfully chases his own tail and spins round in a dizzy circle. Until he gets too drunk and falls down.
Einstein's written words have deficient logical consistency to support both constant observed speed of light and non absolute simultaneity. You non readers rather chase your own tails than to admit Einstein's failure of logic.
Your problems are yours, not mine.
So you gaggle of arguers are self admittedly woefully ignorant of the theory inventor's own ideas as evidenced by his own written words. You are like a little puppy dog who blissfully chases his own tail and spins round in a dizzy circle. Until he gets too drunk and falls down.
Einstein's written words have deficient logical consistency to support both constant observed speed of light and non absolute simultaneity. You non readers rather chase your own tails than to admit Einstein's failure of logic.
Your problems are yours, not mine.