Scaramouche
Registered Member
Quantum Wave Cosmology is my personal view of cosmology. I am passing it off as opinion and speculation about things that science has not yet agreed upon. I have originated threads that address various aspects of QWC and have tried to incorporate the ideas in a Google document that is updated periodically to reflect changes.
I often change the document in response to comments and criticism that are brought up in the threads.
Here is the latest version of the Google.doc.
You can use this thread to make a comment or state a criticism of QWC that you feel I have not yet addressed and I will respond. If I have already addressed it in the Google.doc then I will quote from the document. I may change the document to mitigate the criticism and will post any change made and link you to the updated document.
I may also use this thread to post my own updates to the document and to review certain aspects of QWC in an effort to get your input.
Haven't read it, and don't have an inclination to do so at the moment. I tend to mess around on the Internet while doing other things, so don't have the luxury of reading long documents on here. Just thought I'd throw in a comment.
First, any time you propose any hypothesis, model, relation, or anything which is not part of the commonly accepted array of models and ideas, the very first and most prominent response will be heckling. The very first thought to cross the mind of any reader will be that you're a crackpot solely for proposing something which is not part of the common perception. It's a sad reflection on how fucked up humans can be, but that's what you'll have to deal with.
Secondary to that initial criticism, you will face some who actually think about what you're proposed. But they will consider it from the perspective of believing absolutely in the commonly accepted models and theories, and thus will be unlikely to consider alternatives when the things they believe seem to be functioning quite well.
You may find folks who will consider your proposals without bias. By which I mean that even though they acknowledge the current models are functioning, they may accept that other models may also function and explain things adequately, and they may weigh your proposal on its merits without such bias. You won't find many such people.
Just something you'll have to get accustomed to.