AN
No thanks. But isn't it strange that you keep trying to save the world from me. There is something in my list of ideas that motivates you to be so dedicated and it isn’t saving the world from these ideas. Anyone reading the ideas can see that you are over reaching. What is it? I think if people read them they can decide for themselves.
As your discussion with Guest shows, you're heavily into drinking your own koolaid.
You talk about 'letting people decide for themselves'. Well who exactly are 'the people'? The layman on the street? Well he/she can't tell the difference between good and bad physics anyway, they aren't able to make informed decisions. Or do you think science
should be done by the least informed, that it should be a popularity contest and not about experiment, prediction and the scientific method? Because down that road lies Creationism. I will give you
just enough credit that I'll assume you aren't advocating turning science into a Pop Idol clone, where idiots ring in to vote for what they like (or dislike) the most. So that narrows down 'the people' to 'the scientifically informed'. Unfortunately that hasn't gone too well for you, as I've already commented Guest, myself, Prom, DH and I'm sure others like CptBork, BenTheMan, Temur etc would say as we have, you have nothing of value. But let's set aside us, just incase we're only motivated by fear and worry and that's why we patrol science forums shouting people down. So 'the people' is now 'the scientific community' minus the parts of the scientific community you've already spoken to (ie the aforementioned people, including myself). So how do you get them to see your work? Submit it to journals. After all, if you consider te scientifically educated forum poster to be all about suppressing new ideas you specifically want people who are scientifically educated
but don't read forums. So why are you posting them on forums? You're avoiding the only real target audience you could be wanting, if you're really interested in scientific contributions.
So why are you refusing to submit to a reputable journal? You can't post on forums if you want your work to be read by non-forum readers, should you be equating forum reading + scientific education too closely with 'they hate new ideas'.
If you truely want to expose your work to scientists, you should submit to journals. If you aren't actually interested in developing your work then confine it too forums and ignore all forum posters with a hint of science education. That way you can continue to delude yourself you're 'doing science'.
If you feel I've hit too far from the mark in regards to my definition of 'the people' and my logic of who exactly the relevant 'the people' are, feel free to explain where I'm wrong.