Quantum Mechanics and Relativity as religion ?

[Pinball1970]

As I said before your answers are in the dense side.

Stop criticising people and science that you don't understand, it reflects really poorly on you.

 

[quant]

Stop criticising people and science that you don't understand, it reflects really poorly on you.

Another defender of the faith., one who believes in the face of quoted passages from text books that Schrodinger's wave function does not result in the proliferation of multiple dimensions.

 

[Gawdzilla Sama]

Purdue needs to have a class, "Science for Complete Idiots".

 

[(Q)]

This is just the beginning of the new "Dumbfuckistan" - wait till Maga dissolves the DOE and bans more books. Stupid will be the norm.

 

[James R]

quant:

James R If you understand the virtues of temperance, justice, humility, patience, charity and diligence, you should have absolutely no problem in understanding what I am saying.

Correct. I have absolutely no problem in understanding what you are saying.

Why have you not responded to post #11, above?

Got nothing?

Since you seem to be significantly lacking in these qualities, it is perhaps understandable that you sub-consciously or consciously, can make no sense of what I am saying.

Why have you not responded to post #11, above?

Stop making ludicrous new claims about what I do or do not understand and start trying to support the claims you have made.

You're making yourself look like a petty troll at this point. Is this the best you've got?

I will say it once again, how can you state that for two people starting from Los Angeles at the same time and from the same place and travelling to Las Vegas, travel DIFFERENT distances!

This is a consequence of the theory of relativity. Are you able to follow the derivation of the length contraction formula of special relativity? Is there some flaw in it that you can identify? Or is "I just don't like it. It doesn't feel right to me" the best you've got?

I have asked you this several times now. Each time, you ignore and/or avoid.

Is this the best you've got?

One traveler reaches Las Vegas after travelling only 10 k while the other traveler reaches Las Vegas after travelling for 150 km. How is this possible?

Length contraction.

Do two identical cities of Las Vegas come into existence?

No.

Or does one Las Vegas occupy a different dimensional space than the other Las Vegas.

No. That was your previous error. I took some care to walk you through your error, there. It looks like you completely ignored my thoughtful and helpful response. Why did you do that?

I had posted quite detailed scenarios with worked examples using Einstein’s own equation in post #15 in the: “What if Newton was Wrong?” thread in the Alternative Theories forum. It is a sad indication of the times when anyone questioning if Newton was right can end up in alternate theories.

You keep claimed to have a superior theory of your own to replace the flawed theory of relativity.

Do you, or don't you?

If you do, why won't you present it? Chicken?

Is the problem here that exchemist previously guessed that you might be the author of a particular book which you were trying to advertise, and you denied that you were? Now you're scared you'll be caught out in a lie? Is that it?

It's okay, quant. I'm willing to forgive your lie, if you're willing to be honest from now on. Deal?

But you obtusely refuse to refer to these worked examples and stick to your own perspective,

I don't recall refusing to refer to your worked examples.

Please link me to a worked example you would like me to consider, which I have not already commented on.

... which is “That nothing changes!” everything remains the same, it is only one’s perspective that changes.

I don't recall saying "nothing changes". You must have misread or misremembered what I wrote.

As for perspectives changing, that's what the theory of relativity says! I explained it to you in some detail.

Do you have questions?

So without even bothering to look at the calculations or what is being said, you continue to use the same arguments.

I looked at your calculations. They are not the problem (at least, the ones about length contraction). Your getting to grips with the basic concepts of relativity is, in any case, more important than getting the numbers exactly right, at this early stage in your learning.

You have made a bunch of claims that you have not supported. You need to either retract those claims or attempt to support them. Go back and read through my post #11, above. Then reply to what I wrote there.

Your viewpoint that it is all a question of perspective and that in some miraculous way no 'real' time dilation or length contraction takes place is delusional.

At no time did I say that time dilation and length contraction aren't "real". I was careful to explain what the theory actually says, so you can learn.

Special relativity is ALL about how time really does dilate and lengths do really contract. Look at twin paradox.

Okay.

So, are there any problems with the theory of relativity? If so, what are they?

Can you support any of the claims you have made (see my summary list in post #11), or are you going to retract those claims?

Do you have any questions I can help you with?

 

[DaveC426913]

Quant, you will be fascinated with this experiment that demonstrates time dilation simply and empirically and very effectively. It was done in the back of a camper van by a professor with his family using four atomic clocks.

Here is direct, empirical, unassailable evidence of time dilation, due to nothing more than altitude in Earth's gravity - just as general relativity predicts it will:

Project GREAT: General Relativity Einstein/Essen Anniversary Test

leapsecond.com

 

[Pinball1970]

f quoted passages from text books that Schrodinger's wave function does not result in the proliferation of multiple dimensions.

Which? Quote away.