Alan A Keeling
Registered Member
I have a dog called Dylan. He is absolutely normal. In 2005 I took part (with about 6 other people) in a carefully controlled university experiment to determine whether the dog could sense my return to collect him from an unfamiliar, isolated room. I repeated this a number of times and on several occasions I tried to 'actively transfer' my thoughts to the dog, that I was about to pick him up.
A couple of months later I got a phone call from my colleague who had designed and set up the trial, saying, 'would you be prepared to appear in a BBC documentary'. Why? I asked. He replied that the experiments with my dog showed he was significantly able to sense when I was going to collect him (P< 0.01), but only on the occasions when I had attempted thought transfer. I should add that no other dog/owner experiments gave any statistically significant results.
What does this mean? How would you interpret all this? The experiment was perfectly valid and well randomised with no prior knowledge on my part or the project leader.
Am I psychic? Is the dog psychic? Or is this one of those occasions where statistics simply lie?
A couple of months later I got a phone call from my colleague who had designed and set up the trial, saying, 'would you be prepared to appear in a BBC documentary'. Why? I asked. He replied that the experiments with my dog showed he was significantly able to sense when I was going to collect him (P< 0.01), but only on the occasions when I had attempted thought transfer. I should add that no other dog/owner experiments gave any statistically significant results.
What does this mean? How would you interpret all this? The experiment was perfectly valid and well randomised with no prior knowledge on my part or the project leader.
Am I psychic? Is the dog psychic? Or is this one of those occasions where statistics simply lie?