Proposal: That sex without consent is always rape.

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm still waiting for James Retard to point out where I ever stated that nonconsentual sex is not rape.

Until that happens, then it is just another one of his many strawmen.
 
angrybellsprout:

If you do not intend to debate me, stay out of this thread. I have no further interest in you at this time.

You have 20 minutes to agree to the debate if you want in.
 
Bells, I am happy to have you on my team. I will create the thread in 20 minutes, provided we have an opposing team by then.
 
You made a claim about me.

Either you justify this claim or you withdraw it.

Either link to where I claimed that nonconsentual sex is not rape, or quit your strawmen.
 
james how many days does this run for?
i would love to be on your side but i dont have a week to put into this
 
James R said:
Do you agree to debate according to the Standard Rules set out in the sticky thread, Syzygys?
Click to expand...

I forgot those, but if groupsex is involved, I am in!

For fun I could be on even days in one team and on odd days in the other team.

Nowadays I don't take Sciforums very seriously, I think it is kind of obvious.

P.S.: Kadark promised to tell me some secret Muslim sexual practices, so I am paid for my performance in the debate. I am a gun for hire...
 
James R said:
ABS:

Your post is off topic. Please take it somewhere else.
Click to expand...

How is my post off topic?

The entire point of this topic is that you called me out to defend a position that you claimed that I stated, but you refuse to point out exactly where I ever made this claim.

This is very dishonest.
 
Asguard said:
james how many days does this run for?
i would love to be on your side but i dont have a week to put into this
Click to expand...

According to the [thread=76020]Standard Rules[/thread] for a team debate, the debate could theoretically last up to 12 days, with each team member posting only once every three days.

Of course, if all members of both teams have posted within the 3 day round, no matter how quickly, the next round will start immediately, so the minimum possible time for the debate could be as short as an hour or so, potentially.

I would like to have equal numbers on both teams, preferably, and so far only one person has signed up for the negative...
 
well i yeld to you and bells. If ABS and kadark both want in i will go on your side, if not im happy to cheer you on:p
 
Why do you refuse to support the claim that you made in the OP?

Do you have anything else to offer than strawmen and lies about others?

Do you always just run away when it is time to link to the claims that you made about others?
 
if you join in the debate i might even give you the full story so you can decide for yourself
 
So, have we decided what the debate topic is going to be? I may jump in if it's different from the initial post's topic, although I wouldn't be able to construct a formal post until Wednesday (have a fight tomorrow).

Kadark the Executor
 
Kadark said:
So, have we decided what the debate topic is going to be? I may jump in if it's different from the initial post's topic, although I wouldn't be able to construct a formal post until Wednesday (have a fight tomorrow).
Click to expand...

I have already asked you what topic you would be willing to debate.

Would you like to suggest a topic now, or should I go ahead with my original proposal (now 24 hours old)?

By the way, there will be no "jumping in" once the Formal Debate starts. The participants are to be agreed in advance.

If you feel you cannot make one post every three days, do not participate.
 
James R said:
I have already asked you what topic you would be willing to debate.

Would you like to suggest a topic now, or should I go ahead with my original proposal (now 24 hours old)?
Click to expand...

You started this thread, James, and every single person you challenged was dissatisfied with the debate topic. If you're issuing the challenge, then it only stands to reason that you offer the topic. Truth be told, I don't think anybody wants to discuss the original proposal, considering it has been tackled to death in about three separate threads already. Let's spice things up a little, aiight?

Kadark the Veteran
 
James R said:
I would like to have equal numbers on both teams, preferably, and so far only one person has signed up for the negative...
Click to expand...

Told you don't worry about me. It isn't even a challenge...
 
Kadark said:
You started this thread, James, and every single person you challenged was dissatisfied with the debate topic. If you're issuing the challenge, then it only stands to reason that you offer the topic. Truth be told, I don't think anybody wants to discuss the original proposal, considering it has been tackled to death in about three separate threads already. Let's spice things up a little, aiight?
Click to expand...

I'll take this as a delaying tactic.

I will not wait for you much longer, Kadark.

If you have any serious proposal, please post it now. I am going to get something to eat. When I come back, if you have suggested no alternative, I will begin the debate with the agreed participants on the original topic I suggested, without you.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top