Better yet, why don't you find a post where I have stated otherwise, instead of constantly using strawmen?
You are incapable or unwilling to post a simple "yes" or "no"?
Really, stand up for what you believe, or just go away. Have some guts.
Better yet, why don't you find a post where I have stated otherwise, instead of constantly using strawmen?
Randwolf:
Ok. Just so we're clear, I ask you the same thing I asked ABS:
Do you agree with the statement "That sex without consent is always rape."
A simple "yes" from you and I will happily stop pestering you to debate this topic.
----
Edit to add: Just saw your post above.
That's fine. I withdraw my challenge to you.
My challenge to ABS and Kadark stands.
You are incapable or unwilling to post a simple "yes" or "no"?
Really, stand up for what you believe, or just go away. Have some guts.
You are a rapist for having sex with someone who gives you both implicit and explicit consent to sex, if one or even both parties had been drinking prior to the consent being given.
That sounds like a start for a topic.
You are a rapist for having sex with someone who gives you both implicit and explicit consent to sex, if one or even both parties had been drinking prior to the consent being given.
randwolf, you are being pressured by JamesR. to say "yes", think of the consequences of the word "always" in that statement.
randwolf, you are being pressured by JamesR. to say "yes", think of the consequences of the word "always" in that statement.
I know draq, but I more believe the way it is phrased then I want to nitpick. However, as you know, "always" is never, or hardly ever, true.
13. You are a rapist if you 'nag' her for sex. Because you manage to ply an eventual 'yes' from a weary victim doesn't mean it's not rape. You are a rapist.
14. You are a rapist if you try to circumvent her "No" by talking her into it. She's not playing hard to get, and, even if she IS it's not YOUR responsibility to 'get' her. You're still a rapist.
13. You are a rapist if you 'nag' her for sex. Because you manage to ply an eventual 'yes' from a weary victim doesn't mean it's not rape. You are a rapist.
In the meantime, my original challenge stands.
Your original challenge is bullshit James and you know it. What did you actually expect to accomplish here? You want the bragging rights to say that no one would debate you that nonconsensual sex is not rape? This is typical of radicals. Take a topic, spin it and see if anyone can follow. Forget it James....
I would be willing to have a friendly debate on what might constitute implied consent to sex.