Proof of the existence of God

I didn't say that. Yet another example of you making stuff up to agree with your points.
God is a part of our existence whether we believe he exists or not.



Some will say that God is impersonal, and some will say that God is personal. Some will define God as formless being, some define him as having a body. There are quite a few definitions floating around, but every definition has its basis within THE definition of God. That is how you know they're defining God.

jan.
If god does exist, why all the variations in the definition?
 
22683_1538357136425389_7734859686641895953_n.jpg


LOL "non-entity" atheists.
 
If god does exist, why all the variations in the definition?

They only appear as variations because people see things from their perspective. But all definitions I mentioned are actual definitions (different aspects) of God.

You are one person, but people only see a part of you, and will define you from their perspective..

jan.
 
I didn't say that. Yet another example of you making stuff up to agree with your points.
So pray tell, how are we meant to take "God is a part of our existence whether we believe he exists or not" if not as a claim of his existence? Maybe your answer will help shed some light on the way you think.
 
So pray tell, how are we meant to take "God is a part of our existence whether we believe he exists or not" if not as a claim of his existence? Maybe your answer will help shed some light on the way you think.

Think about it, and try come up with something else.

jan
 
Think about it, and try come up with something else.
You really don't help yourself, do you Jan.
Please stop dodging questions. It is your MO. It is tiresome. If you have no intention of answering, why do you bother responding at all :rolleyes: (and yes, that was a rhetorical question).

If you could respond to the following with an actual answer rather than just another question, that would be great, thanks:

So pray tell, how are we meant to take "God is a part of our existence whether we believe he exists or not" if not as a claim of his existence?
 
Last edited:
You really don't help yourself, do you Jan. :rolleyes:

So pray tell, how are we meant to take "God is a part of our existence whether we believe he exists or not" if not as a claim of his existence?

We are discussing God, some claim He is real, some claim He isn't. Whichever way you look at it God is important, and affects our lives. Whether God actually exists, to the point where everyone in the world accept His actual existence, is a different matter, and is simply fuel for another discussion, where he is, yet again, the subject matter.

jan.
 
If god does exist, why all the variations in the definition?
Hmm...you know better Spider why antagonis?
Multidimensionality beings of course posing as gods false gods like thor and such others. God does not exist in time or space but is expressed in it. And Jesus Christ embodied the highest expression describing "Him" in the domain of time and space.
 
Hmm...you know better Spider why antagonis?
Multidimensionality beings of course posing as gods false gods like thor and such others. God does not exist in time or space but is expressed in it. And Jesus Christ embodied the highest expression describing "Him" in the domain of time and space.
Those are just the kind of stupid nonsense words that inspire antagonism. Do people fall for this sort of line?
 
Becuase of belief in separation we are divided by multidimensional realities we remain partial and try and identify separate parts as if they were not all the same thing. Most of the "time" as a temporal bieng you will miss this vital point.
 
Back
Top