Prime numbers , Unified Fields

Status
Not open for further replies.

Me-Ki-Gal

Banned
Banned
Has anyone seem a unified field theory dealing with the laws of multiples of nine, or to say the repeat effect with the same properties as the law of multiples of nine? Has anyone explored the repeat pattern of all multiples and the mirror imagery with the same effect as the powers of nine?
Could this be a unifying field?
Is there a picture of the the 6n form in the prime number field and is it understood that it is a manipulation of the power of 3's? Help would be good as it could help me get over delusions of grandeur. Thinking no one else but me sees the mirror imagery of it all .
 
The effect of multiples of 9 only occurs in the base 10.
 
The effect of multiples of 9 only occurs in the base 10.
So in other base systems you don't get the nine effect , or just not the full effect of being only 4 forms plus 4 mirror forms and the 1 form creating a unison effect of nine. I was thinking in other base systems the last digit say it was 7 acted like a 9 in base ten, but by 7s instead of 9s Can you explain this phenomenon in base 10 where lets say 2x4=8 and no matter what combo you use on any other number by the law of nine equals the same . EXample
11x1111=12221 and the sum reduced by the power of nine = 2x4=8
 
You are a poor quality troll

O.K. smarty pants, since I am just a silly old carpenter of 40 years and can only understand the action of "with a hammer in my hand every thing looks like a nail.
tell me why , why because even trolls need love, If you can help me try to rise above troll status, if that is even possible, for my trollness runs so deep in my family genetic make up. Tell me why 10 divided by zero is not just plain old 10.
I mean if you have 10 of something and you divide it by nothing you would still have ten . O.K. sorry that was stupid . This is my real question :
Why is it that (a-1)x(a+1)=a sq.-1 no that is stupid too
Why are all prime forms of 2 x prime forms of 4 always prime forms of 8 given all primes are of the 2,8,5 form or 1,7,4 form in the 6n line
 
Last edited:
tumblr_lak645iCFm1qe2mq3o1_250.gif
 
Thrice push fastly, desired results comes!

What ? by joe I think you are on to something. Yes for if you consider 1,2 where as 1 is the past, 2 is the present and 3 of course would be the future by adding 1+2 then it would seem to reason that " The past pushes the future and the future pulls the past and through resonance things are propelled further into the future and in this case the convergence of 0 happens on top of the 2 so as 1 would happen in a 1 to 1 ratio like this: 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 and 2 would happen in a 2 to 2 ratio like this: 2,4,6,8,1,5,7,9 , but the future of 3 would be 3,6 9,3,6,9,3,6,9 all converging at 0 yet if you consider the convergence of 2x3 the resonance of it all can only be the future 6, Let us take a looksy: 3,9,15,21,27 in one sub group and
6,12,18,24,30,36 in the other sub group. Hey I get it this is like an event horizon off in the distance. The convergences of 2 and 3 where it is still properties of 3 yet it is also properties of 2. Kind of like the marriage of of of the future and the past.
 
Ahh hell it's less fun once it's obvious the trolling is contrived...
 
O.K. consider this pseudoscience by the laws of nine
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
2 4 6 8 1 3 5 7 9 2 4 6 8 1 3 5 7 9 2 4 6 8 1 3 5 7 9
3 6 9 3 6 9 3 6 9 3 6 9 3 6 9 3 6 9 3 6 9 3 6 9 3 6 9
4 8 3 7 2 6 1 5 9 4 8 3 7 2 6 1 5 9 4 8 3 7 2 6 1 5 9
5 1 6 2 7 3 8 4 9 5 1 6 2 7 3 8 4 9 5 1 6 2 7 3 8 4 9
6 3 9 6 3 9 6 3 9 6 3 9 6 3 9 6 3 9 6 3 9 6 3 9 6 3 9
7 5 3 1 8 6 4 2 9 7 5 3 1 8 6 4 2 9 7 5 3 1 8 6 4 2 9
8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 9
9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
2 4 5 6 1 3 5 7 9 2 4 6 8 1 3 5 7 9 2 4 6 8 1 3 5 7 9
3 6 9 3 6 9 3 6 9 3 6 9 3 6 9 3 6 9 3 6 9 3 6 9 3 6 9
4 8 3 7 2 6 1 5 9 4 8 3 7 2 6 1 5 9 4 8 3 7 2 6 1 5 9
5 1 6 2 7 3 8 4 9 5 1 6 2 7 3 8 4 9 5 1 6 2 7 3 8 4 9
6 3 9 6 3 9 6 3 9 6 3 9 6 3 9 6 3 9 6 3 9 6 3 9 6 3 9
7 5 3 1 8 6 4 2 9 7 5 3 1 8 6 4 2 9 7 5 3 1 8 6 4 2 9
8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 9
9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9
now what is so peculiar to Me is the diagonal repeat of squares
1,4,9,7,7,9,4,1,9,1,4,9,7,7,9,4,1,
now consider the theory that Johann Sebastian Bach encoded his music with the 14 and the 41 can there be something here to his hear in is ear, The mirror: 14977941 9 14977941
O.K. then maybe it is possible if you consider in music : the circle of 5ths is inverted of the circle of 4ths and the same with a 3rd and a 6th and the same with a 2nd to a 7th and then of course the root with the octave 8.
The unified theory of music. I think Pythagoras would have something to say about that one if he was here on this thread.
 
As AlexG pointed out, any mathematical patterns that you notice with 9 (and 11) are almost certainly related to the fact that 9 (11) is 1 less (1 more) than the base of our numbering system. In other words, you would see the same phenomena for "15" and "17" in hexadecimal.
 
Has anyone seem a unified field theory dealing with the laws of multiples of nine, or to say the repeat effect with the same properties as the law of multiples of nine? Has anyone explored the repeat pattern of all multiples and the mirror imagery with the same effect as the powers of nine?
Could this be a unifying field?
Its explained via modular arithmetic which is a standard tool and area of research in number theory.

Generically if x = Np + q where N and p are integers then it is said that x = q mod p, ie x is q more than a multiple of p. For example 7 = 2 mod 5, since 7 = 5*1 + 2, 23 = 7 mod 16 or 23 = 7 mod 8. It easily explains things like why a number which is divisible by 3 also have the sum of its digits divisible by 3.

We use base 10, which is 1 more than a multiple of 3, ie 10 = 1 mod 3. Now consider a number with 2 digits (ie its between 10 and 99 inclusive), which we'll write as XY (for example if we consider 56 then X = 5, Y = 6 or for 93 X = 9 and Y = 3 etc). It follows that XY = 10*X + Y, so for 56 we have 56 = 5*10 = 6 etc. Now consider this in mod 3, where we have 10 = 1 mod 3. Thus we have XY = X*10 + Y = X*(3*3+1) + Y and taking this mod 3 gives XY = X*1 + Y mod 3 = X+Y mod 3. Thus the 2 digit number XY is divisible by 3 if X+Y is. This works for any number of digits because $$10^{N} = 1$$ mod 3 for all whole numbers N.

For instance, consider 5541. Is this divisible by 3? Well 5541 = 5+5+4+1 mod 3 = 15 mod 3. So 5541 is divisible by 3 if 15 is. Obviously it is but we can use the same method again to see it, ie 15 = 1+5 mod 3 = 6 mod 3 and 6 is divisible by 3, so 15 is, so 5541 is. Its clear that you can do this for any sized initial number, repeating it again and again until you get a single digit number which you can easily determine whether its a multiple of 3.

For instance, is 536392004240671 divisible by 3? We add up the digits, 5+3+6+3+9+2+0+0+4+2+4+0+6+7+1 = 52. Now add its digits up, 5+2 = 7. 7 isn't divisible by 3 and thus neither is 536392004240671. Didn't even need a calculator!

Precisely the same applies to mod 9 arithmetic. If you use hexidecimal (base 16) then it works for mod 5, mod 3 and mod 15. If you use base 12 then it works for mod 11 arithmetic.
 
As AlexG pointed out, any mathematical patterns that you notice with 9 (and 11) are almost certainly related to the fact that 9 (11) is 1 less (1 more) than the base of our numbering system. In other words, you would see the same phenomena for "15" and "17" in hexadecimal.

would you see the same effect in base 10 with all numbers one less and one more, for example
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 now if you think of 7 as a zero or to say the point of reference that would equal zero, your starting point and heading out in two opposite directions stating with one out causing ordered pairing 6 and 8, 9 and 5, 10 and 4 and so on, would this have the same harmonic results as our conception of music we all like and understand now? Maybe just by the halving of the sum of the 2 directions being 7 ? Or to say Do you think there would still be harmonic resonance and if the concept was applied to other base systems would there be harmonic resonance, and I don't mean theoretical resonance but actual physical resonance like you get when you pluck two strings to the interval of a third ?
 
Its explained via modular arithmetic which is a standard tool and area of research in number theory.

Generically if x = Np + q where N and p are integers then it is said that x = q mod p, ie x is q more than a multiple of p. For example 7 = 2 mod 5, since 7 = 5*1 + 2, 23 = 7 mod 16 or 23 = 7 mod 8. It easily explains things like why a number which is divisible by 3 also have the sum of its digits divisible by 3.

We use base 10, which is 1 more than a multiple of 3, ie 10 = 1 mod 3. Now consider a number with 2 digits (ie its between 10 and 99 inclusive), which we'll write as XY (for example if we consider 56 then X = 5, Y = 6 or for 93 X = 9 and Y = 3 etc). It follows that XY = 10*X + Y, so for 56 we have 56 = 5*10 = 6 etc. Now consider this in mod 3, where we have 10 = 1 mod 3. Thus we have XY = X*10 + Y = X*(3*3+1) + Y and taking this mod 3 gives XY = X*1 + Y mod 3 = X+Y mod 3. Thus the 2 digit number XY is divisible by 3 if X+Y is. This works for any number of digits because $$10^{N} = 1$$ mod 3 for all whole numbers N.

For instance, consider 5541. Is this divisible by 3? Well 5541 = 5+5+4+1 mod 3 = 15 mod 3. So 5541 is divisible by 3 if 15 is. Obviously it is but we can use the same method again to see it, ie 15 = 1+5 mod 3 = 6 mod 3 and 6 is divisible by 3, so 15 is, so 5541 is. Its clear that you can do this for any sized initial number, repeating it again and again until you get a single digit number which you can easily determine whether its a multiple of 3.

For instance, is 536392004240671 divisible by 3? We add up the digits, 5+3+6+3+9+2+0+0+4+2+4+0+6+7+1 = 52. Now add its digits up, 5+2 = 7. 7 isn't divisible by 3 and thus neither is 536392004240671. Didn't even need a calculator!

Precisely the same applies to mod 9 arithmetic. If you use hexidecimal (base 16) then it works for mod 5, mod 3 and mod 15. If you use base 12 then it works for mod 11 arithmetic.

O.K. then I am able to grasp most of that, but it will take my feeble little mind a little while to process all that as the tin man is made mostly of saw dust from breathing it for so long . I will work hard and clear as much saw dust out of my head to try and understand the full implications of what you have giving as a most precious gift great wizard , or is it that you are the good witch of the north with your magical over the top skills. Or simply Thanx for your explanation
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top