Originally posted by Xev
della-dee:
Actually, I never said either of these things about you. Read my post, please.
Now, do you have anything valid to say, or are you going to simply make erronious statements?
If you claim that speech shouldn't be granted first amendment protection, your post would be more appropriate in politics, with the title: "I am a stupid fascist".
Since I'm assuming that you're not a stupid fascist, it necessarily follows that speech should be protected as such.
____________________________________________________
Okay, i apologize. i see that you did not call me illogical. Yet, now i have nothing valid to say? Then why did you bother responding to an "invalid" thread?
Also, i am a firm believer that speech should be granted protection under the first ammendment; however, my question is "how is pornography protected under this when it is not speech?"
(also, not to plead ignorance, but I am a Canadian so it is possible I am missing something about the First ammendment)
By the way,Xev:
you really get all hot and bothered very easily about people misreading your posts. Maybe you need to take your own advice.