ethon jubal
Registered Member
A person reading this document may have questions. I will do my best to answer any and all to the limit of my ability. If you have answers to my questions I would hope you would do the same.
Understanding the beginning is very difficult when one starts in the middle even if one stays to the end. The omnivierse as far as I have been able to gather is steady state but was in a condition of perfect symmetry, time was a cycle, every thing written before was over written, over and over, repeating with out number. It had no features accept that. {It should be noted that Time is the only thing that survived the preconditon of the protouniverse}.
Nothing could happen in the universe until time reppeated at least once, in this form the zero point universes have one feature, spin in any direction, in other words, they are truly omnidirectional. After the first cycle somthing interesting happens.
"Into play comes the number of number of repetitions come number of repetitons come number of repitions come" {please note there was a symmetry break here in the text that can not be resolved and although it doesn't make sense is totally relevant, don't drive your self crazy over it, the quotes around it are to highlight it and hopefully it will become more clear latter when I begin the discussion of the paradox}
The very fact every thing repeated creates a flaw, wrinkel, dimple, knot, or inclusion, call it whatever. The fact that it{the flaw} MUST come from outside the system makes the universe break symmetry. Two revolutions are self-referenving, the path has been traveld before but the universe is omnidrectional.
This is a paradox, if the path, is, how could the body in question been free to spin is any direction? The preuniverse can not resolve this and promptly destroys its self, with staggering [infinite?] energy.
Now there are three things that survive, time energy, and the most interesting paradox. I know this sounds almost child like but that is the way it came out simple and clear and to the point. This as far as I know it is the first tenitive philosophical inroads into a pre Plank time big bang and is origanal and new [I cannot truly know this].
Plese understand any new thought in the Yelm is a VERRY BIG DEAL. There is more but this is all I can give right now, anny feed back would hope stimulate further information.
Understanding the beginning is very difficult when one starts in the middle even if one stays to the end. The omnivierse as far as I have been able to gather is steady state but was in a condition of perfect symmetry, time was a cycle, every thing written before was over written, over and over, repeating with out number. It had no features accept that. {It should be noted that Time is the only thing that survived the preconditon of the protouniverse}.
Nothing could happen in the universe until time reppeated at least once, in this form the zero point universes have one feature, spin in any direction, in other words, they are truly omnidirectional. After the first cycle somthing interesting happens.
"Into play comes the number of number of repetitions come number of repetitons come number of repitions come" {please note there was a symmetry break here in the text that can not be resolved and although it doesn't make sense is totally relevant, don't drive your self crazy over it, the quotes around it are to highlight it and hopefully it will become more clear latter when I begin the discussion of the paradox}
The very fact every thing repeated creates a flaw, wrinkel, dimple, knot, or inclusion, call it whatever. The fact that it{the flaw} MUST come from outside the system makes the universe break symmetry. Two revolutions are self-referenving, the path has been traveld before but the universe is omnidrectional.
This is a paradox, if the path, is, how could the body in question been free to spin is any direction? The preuniverse can not resolve this and promptly destroys its self, with staggering [infinite?] energy.
Now there are three things that survive, time energy, and the most interesting paradox. I know this sounds almost child like but that is the way it came out simple and clear and to the point. This as far as I know it is the first tenitive philosophical inroads into a pre Plank time big bang and is origanal and new [I cannot truly know this].
Plese understand any new thought in the Yelm is a VERRY BIG DEAL. There is more but this is all I can give right now, anny feed back would hope stimulate further information.
Last edited by a moderator: