Tiassa,
I had no intention of lying ...
I don't believe you because you are unreliable. You have been caught lying; your justifications now are all subject to the same doubt.
... that was my interpretation of him ....
No, it wasn't. Otherwise you could have explained your interpretation, instead of admonishing people to "take a moment to let that sink in", that "Alex Jones ... is now saying pizzagate is bullshit".
No, he didn't. If you weren't so damnably lazy, perhaps you could actually establish some credibility.
... he does not believe it is real, merely a falseflag (ergo fake), yes the man is crazy and thinks it is a cover for a deeper conspiracy, but none the less he does not believe the premise of this Clinton adminstration child sex exchange, ergo "bullshit".
Calling bullshit means the scandal is bullshit and was never true. It does not mean the bullshit scandal is everyone else's fault. Jones libelously accused Hillary Clinton of murder, in service to overseas botnets. Now he needs to cover his ass, tries to say he didn't, and the one thing he can't say is that he and that many of his fellow tinfoilers are utterly clueless.
Sure you can interpret his blathering how ever you want.
It helps to pay attention to his blathering instead of reciting bland, inapplicable, dishonet talking points.
I don't see how I gave anyone the impression that Alex Jones would be railing against fake news ...
See, this is why you're not believable.
You wrote:
• And now for the finally: Alex Jones, yes Alex "they are putting fluoride in the water to make you gay" Jones, is now saying pizzagate is bullshit, take a moment to let that sink in.
So "Alex Jones ... is now saying pizzagate is bullshit, take a moment to let that sink in."
Okay, why?
Explain yourself.
Why is it significant that "Alex Jones ... is now saying pizzagate is bullshit"? Why do you need people to "take a moment to let that sink in"?
See, what is missing from your posts is any supportable
affirmative argument. You just say thinks like how you didn't and you don't, but while you can say you don't see how you gave anyone the impression blah blah blah, you can't actually affirmatively explain, defend, or justify yourself.
So, yeah. Quit wasting your life.
You could have, by now, offered anything from the transcript you wanted to support your argument, but you've chosen not to.
Seriously, I could go down to a drama workshop, hand out your Alex Jones bullshit line with exactly no stage direction, and every actor there would nail it.
... come on now, the man generates fake news, but this one is getting too much for even he to handle and he trying to constrain his insane audience in his own way. Alex can't simply denounce it, or his audience will revolt claiming he is bought out or replaced by a reptilian or Illuminati clone (sounds like a joke, but it is not), so he has got to spin that no the words mean code for something worse than childsex and that is all a false flag for something greater.
Too much? Even for you?
Hey, Electric Fetus, you just slipped again.
As for it being dangerous, first off: the man is a clown, a kook, a bad joke, he actually thinks the government is building a gay bomb and controlling us with fluoride and chem trails. Second: Anyone that believes him have only themselves to blame. Third: he has a right to speak, if your going to say someones speech is dangerous you better be ready to sue them for libel, slander or demand their arrest for inciting violence.
You're ignoring the fact, then, that this has already escalated to violence?
All you're doing there is shifting the burden. Instead of the necessity of proving accusations true, you are now obliging others to prove negatives.
And all for Alex Jones.
Imagine that.
There's a reason you are not trustworthy, Electric Fetus.
Now if you have a problem with my link to his video, merely ask and I will remove it.
I'm of the opinion not deliberately misrepresenting it should be enough. Quite obviously, you disagree.
As for the rest of your claims: you have your own conspiracy theories, certainly not on par with Jones, but to think I'm some arch villain of evil against the human rights of women, tsk-tsk.
You are, however, a liar who needs to moralize against straw men.
And you're not smart enough to be an arch-villain.
I openly told you before, repeated word for word that I believe women are full human beings deserving of all human rights fulls stop (or something to that accord) and yet you still prefer to believe I'm a misogynist.
It's because (A) your word cannot be trusted, (B) you continue to rally for bullies and bigots, and (C) you have a habit of seemingly arbitrary rhetorical collapse when it comes to dealing with women.
In other words, there is what you say, and then there is what you do. To wit:
Clearly I'm not going to convince you otherwise, just as you and your ilk will never convince me otherwise that because of your alienating behavior you helped divide liberals and makes us look like hatemongers uncaring to the economic issues of the time, and handing us President Donald Trump. So just as you have your immutable opinion of me, I have one of you and my only solace is that all the horror Trump will bring will hurt you as much as it will hurt me.
No, you'll get some of what you want out of it. Now you have someone to coddle the bullies.
But thank you for proving my point. You don't get to call yourself a liberal while insisting on a conservative narrative. Seriously, maybe if you were actually capable of discussing, say, the economic issues of the time, instead of sinmply reciting conservative talking points, well, at least then it wouldn't be such a waste of your life.
Seriously, the Electoral College win is a triumph of self-destruction. Ask Teena Colebrook, for instance:
When Donald Trump named his Treasury secretary, Teena Colebrook felt her heart sink.
She had voted for the president-elect on the belief that he would knock the moneyed elites from their perch in Washington. And she knew Trump's pick for Treasury — Steven Mnuchin — all too well.
OneWest, a bank formerly owned by a group of investors headed by Mnuchin, had foreclosed on her Los Angeles-area home in the aftermath of the Great Recession, stripping her of the two units she rented as a primary source of income.
"I just wish that I had not voted," said Colebrook, 59. "I have no faith in our government anymore at all. They all promise you the world at the end of a stick and take it away once they get in."
Less than a month after his presidential win, Trump's populist appeal has started to clash with a Cabinet of billionaires and millionaires that he believes can energize economic growth.
(Boak and Horwitz↱)
No, really: She voted for Donald Trump. What in the world did she expect? Right now it is true, I have no idea what to tell this voter. I'd like to help, but
as you're aware↗, it's not just this one voter. Voters in Kentucky elected an anti-ACA governor and then Donald Trump, yet as you were reminded last month, now they're worried about their health care. And
your↗ response?
So you seem to think people are smart and consistent? This election will be a hard lesson learned for idiots, many will refuse to learn, only become more delusional and blame everyone but themselves.
Civilized society is not a suicide pact. You should probably take a moment to let that sink in.