philosophy of 0+0

i have proven that existence is infinite and had no start.

simple mathematics my children.

0+0 is 0 correct?. so there must always have been 1, or maybe 1+1 or in other words 2. or we would not have anything right now.


yes it is as simple as that,


good day.


peace.
 
If you consider "0" to be the identity element of an albein group whose operation is "addition," then 0+0 = 0.
 
That's a relief. I can once again sleep at night. Scientists and mathematicians have been pondering the right equation forever when it was right in front of their face all along. Good job.
 
This thread is just about the dumbest I've seen... how dare you make one stupider than mine! I'll get you for that!

According to math 0+0 = 0

If you think outside mathmatics then 0+0=0 because the first 0 meets the second, but both being 0's they only stay that way.
 
so if we consider the universe in a mathematical way, that means there must always have been something to produce something else,


you cannot multiply or expand if you do not have to begin with.

so non existence + non existence = non existence,

but existence bieng infinite + existence bieng infinite = the universe today.



:).

peace.
 
wtf is this all about? It's posted in like 3 seperate subforums... I've lost my mind...

PS I'm the only 0
 
I kinda viewed it like the universe occupying a dimension. Somehow this dimension (which contained nothing) suddenly had matter and energy. Wouldn't that suggest it came from outside the 0?
 
so if we consider the universe in a mathematical way, that means there must always have been something to produce something else,

Not that it's remotely valid to make use of such a metaphor but, essentially, I'd say you're correct here. However, the significant factor here is how one defines 'exist'.


but existence bieng infinite + existence bieng infinite = the universe today.

As all tautologies are, though valid, this is pointless.
 
Not that it's remotely valid to make use of such a metaphor but, essentially, I'd say you're correct here. However, the significant factor here is how one defines 'exist'.




As all tautologies are, though valid, this is pointless.



as opposed to not existing,

0 = not exist

1 = exist.


this is as valid and worthwhile as any other discussion, but lets not sway from the point of the thread :)

0+0= 0

1+1=2

i think i deserve a prize.


peace.
 
we seek complex answers because we are gay.

its in 3 different forums for 3 different reasons, its in physics and math for the obvious reason,


its in philosophy to discuss the philosophical qualities surrounding such an idea,

and its in the religion forum because some of the assholes here dont look in any other damn forums and i wanted them to know :)


peace.
 
Back
Top