From what you have written here, you appear to believe there is no sense in which God can be categorised as actually good or evil, and that it is a human mistake to attempt to do so.
Not "a human mistake" but a human characteristic.
But then we have your inconsistency in claiming, for example, that "God is Goodness", whatever that is supposed to mean.
It means God is the standard of what is good.
And you will do this in spite of your assertion that "Evilness" is the same as "evil".
'Evii' is a distortion of good. Like atheism, it has no existence by itself, only in relation to good/theism.
See for yourself. Look for the definition of Evilness, the look for the definition of Goodness.
If a person perceives that the moon is made of cheese, that is a mistake, even if it is an honest belief. See my post above.
How can you perceive the moon to be made of cheese?
Here you are talking about a person knowing that they have made a mistake. Their knowledge, or lack of it, does not negate the fact that they are mistaken. A person can be mistaken and not know it.
I agree.
The question of the thread is not about whether a person has honest beliefs. It is about whether God is good or evil.
Therefore, the thread is about perceptions.
Is this an answer from you, then, Jan? Or are you attempting to project a "perception" onto somebody else?
This is from learning about God from scriptures and people who have a great understanding of God.
Is it your opinion ("perception") that God isn't evil? If so, is it also your opinion that God isn't good? Or is it your opinion that God is good?
God isn't human.
Is it a category mistake to apply notions of "good" and "evil" to God, then? This would mean that God is neither good nor evil. Correct?
It is if the person understands that God is not human.
So you have no opinion on the question of the topic, now?
Not sure what you mean.
Are you saying then that the question of whether God is good or evil is one of those things that we have no knowledge of, then?
No.
Jan.