Fox News coverage of breaking news events is actually quite good.
It depends on what the "breaking news" is. If it is breaking news that benefits Democrats or the president, well the news won't be so "breaking". If fact, Fox News is likely to almost completely ignore it. But if the "breaking news" is something that benefits the Republican Party like a pseudo scandal (e.g. IRS, Benghazi, etc.) well then it gets back to back coverage.
Which is most of the time. Most of the time, "breaking news" isn't happening.I expect that what you and Moveon object to is Fox's opinion programming that plays when breaking news isn't happening..
The reason you and Moveon object to it is because it doesn't reflexively favor the views and agenda of the American Democratic party and of the left more generally.
I don't think you have been paying attention. Fox isn't liked because it tells lies, deceives, and is downright dishonest in its programming. That is why in academic survey after survey, Fox News viewers have been found to be the least well informed, even less well informed than people who watch no news at all. That is more than Moveon at work.
That's precisely why I like Fox. I think that it's important that the full range of opinion be aired. Fox is the only major American broadcast news outlet that tilts towards the Republicans. (That's why Fox receives so much hatred from those who dream of using the media to steer public opinion leftward.) Republican voters are half of the US population and it's vitally important to the future of democracy that they have a voice and that their views be expressed.
You like Fox because it strokes your ideology. It tells you what you want to hear. And if you think Fox is the only major broadcast news that "tilts" towards Republicans, well you need to get out more. I take it you have never watched CNBC or "Morning Joe" on MSNBC? The Joe in "Morning Joe" is Joe Scarborough a former right wing and very "conservative" Republican congressman. I find a "full range" of opinion aired on most networks, with the exception being Fox News. The "Morning Joe" program does air both sides of story even though Joe Scarborough is very Republican. NPR is also another great source of information. As I said earlier, NPR reports news the way news use to be reported in the US. I find it very refreshing.
I used to watch Fox News, party for my aunt when I visited her and party to see what they were up to. I don't watch Fox News, it's a waste of my time. Because I can never be sure of what is true and what isn't true with Fox. So why waste my time? There are many other more credible news sources. So I no longer waste my time with Fox News like NPR.
Bottom line: Fox News is no more objectionable than MSNBC, which has positioned itself editorially as the voice of the so-called "progressive" wing of the Democratic party. It's just that Fox attracts far more viewers.
If that is so, then why does MSNBC carry conservative programming like "Morning Joe" with Republican and former Republican Congressman Joe Scarborough hosting the program? Further, unlike Fox News, I have never had any of the MSNBC hosts or any of their guests outright lie to me and attempt to deceive me. They have made mistakes for which they promptly apologize. I cannot say that for Fox News. Fox News, outside of Republican talk radio, is most objectionable. I don't like people who lie to or attempt to deceive me. So I don't watch Fox News.