Dear Judge, You Can't Rape The Willing
Girl defends pedophile lover
As she was questioned by detectives about her 29-year-old male companion, the 13-year-old girl started writing a letter.
"Dear Judge," it began. "I would like you to know that he asked me to marry him and I said yes. ... Just remember you can't molest, rape or kidnap the willing."
Nevertheless, Davis Michael Romero was charged yesterday in U.S. District Court with one count of transporting a minor with intent to engage in illicit sexual activity, a day after they were captured at the Seattle Public Library downtown.
It wasn't the first time Romero has gotten into trouble over the girl, identified as DGA, both from Glendale, Ariz.
SeattlePI.com
Essentially, he was seeing the mother, then the girl, got kicked out over that ... yeah, it seems to be a mess. He's been charged before in Arizona, with 80 counts of sexual misconduct, but the girl--then twelve--refused to cooperate, so the case fell apart.
• • •
Should we choose to respect the girl's claim that she is willing, what does that imply about competency? An historical footnote reminds that in 1875, the age of consent for a girl was 10, and you could convince her to participate through bribery. Essentially, legal prostitution of pre-teen girls. It's an interesting contrast: as the onset of menses has moved younger, the age of consent and standards of social propriety have pushed back.
Picture this girl, DGA, in seven years. She's twenty, has three kids, two of whom still live with her. She's a wreck, on welfare, fill in the morbid details.
One social policy would bring her into the fold, attempt to meet her needs, and seek a way to make her into a productive person. Another social policy would leave her to fend for herself, having made her decisions.
This basic juxtaposition is often merely generalization, but if society is to honor DGA's wishes at this time, it should in the future, too. While the truth of the situation will likely fall in between--or, who knows, she may grow up stable and normal--it is the cruel option that highlights the conundrum.
Is a girl, at 12, competent to make such decisions? Is a man, 29, who cheats on his girlfriend in order to bang her preteen daughter, competent at all? Respecting her decision at age 12 or 13 suggests that we will almost certainly see the public institutions seeking to respect her needs again in seven or eight years. While it may seem disrespectful to absolve any human being of competence, there
are people who will get pissed off and demand, "What the hell are you doing?" if you reach out and stop them from wandering in front of a moving bus.
And while some may be content to let such folks die, or suffer in poverty and consequences, the rest of us live in society, and whether our compassion is motivated by human solidarity or simple greed, our society works better and benefits more people to a greater degree if we protect the incompetent against themselves.
This is why we don't let crazy people sign contracts, and why you need a parent's permission to have a credit card.
Oh, well. Maybe we can blame the gays. Or the Democrats. Or Hollywood. Or Britney. Or the French. Or ....
Just remember she's already tripled her chances of cervical cancer. I mean, hell, I'm all for public health, but I remember living in Oregon listening to people complain about the idea that cigarette taxes funding the healthcare system would pay for all people, and not just non-smokers.
So ... how many folks think the cops should just lay off?
____________________
Notes: