I doubt if the Universe can just be reduced to a maths equation. These unit-less numbers can't be the whole answer.
But carry on.
Origin of the universe
- Thread starter pluto2
- Start date
But carry on.
You would consign Stephen Hawking to the cesspool?
You have completely missed the verbiage that I used. I said that *nothing* doesn't APPEAR to be anything more than a human-made concept. I did not CLAIM that *nothing* does or does not objectively exist. While I certainly don't think an absence of everything / anything could exist, I am issuing zero claim about it.
The opening poster asked this specific question: "Did the universe really come from nothing, aka ex nihilo or was the Buddha right when he said that the universe has no begining and no end?". The correct answer is in fact nobody knows (not just that, the opening poster positions the question as an -OR- question and it's by no means certain that those are the only choices). To know the answer means you have knowledge about the universe / reality that would greatly trump the sum of all scientific knowledge to date. You in particular (nor any other well established crackpot pseudoscientist) do not posess such knowledge.
So why did you say it was the first correct thing that I had said then? You have been arguing with yourself all night on here. So now you think that NOTHING could exist?
Hawking doesn't post bullshit the way you and Robbitybob1 do.
Specious argument.
It is a fair dinkum debate, so what is wrong with it?
He said exactly what I posted. +1 +-1 = 0. Those exact words. He is now using some of my theory, so I can use it too.
Watch from 23 minutes...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WQhd05ZVYWg
See I told you I was a genius, and I told you that science would have to end up with my theory in the end.
Last edited:
What I stated was "This MAY be your first correct statement... ". I personally don't think that *nothing* can exist, but that is an opinion.
I looked up the definition specious argument - "an argument that appears good at first view but is really fallacious"
Well you have the opportunity to falsify the arguments - come on instead of just complaining.
Fair dinkum?It is a fair dinkum debate, so what is wrong with it?
Only if you're braindead (Pincho qualifies, you're getting there).
That would be a lie.
Try reading what I wrote: Pincho's "conclusion" that I want to consign Hawking to the Cesspool is specious, since that's not what I stated.I looked up the definition specious argument - "an argument that appears good at first view but is really fallacious"
Well you have the opportunity to falsify the arguments - come on instead of just complaining.
Watch the video then. He even digs a hole the same as I build an igloo.
Watched it.
And you're twisting the statement.
But that's to be expected since you're clueless on actual science.
Which is completely consistent with my last few responses... I could highlight specific words to prove the point but would it really do you any good?
You could stop arguing with yourself?
Zero times Zero also equals Zero. Zero is zero, Plus Zero minus zero is also zero.
yeah. The science which I posted, and now Stephen Hawking is using. The same science which last year you were posting...
Wrong
Wrong
Wrong
Wrong