GundamWing
Registered Senior Member
...AND MACM DOES IT AGAIN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!.... :m: :m: :m:
NO you dont you dont pay attention to JR's, chroots or any other REAL scientists comments, because no matter how many times they have told you your theories dont make sense you still come back and say things like 0 = (+1)+(-1) is an expression for creation , even after james R have said there is nothing more to this then simple arithmetic.
seriously man post some real math, some thing we can all work with so we can see ONCE and FOR all whether or not what your saying is true.
You like to compare yourself with einstien right.
You do expect that your theory be taught in schools right maybe even replace relativity (because like you said before you have not used relativity to prove relativity, so your ideas should be original am i correct), so post something which might be taught at a first year university course so "people like me" may be able to understand it.
I mean Mac i didnt want to make any further comments but im intrested in what you have to say, Seriously & also if possible i want to 2 things from you :
1. your forgiveness for making comments on your theory when i myself am not qualified to do so as i am not a scientist
2. some sort of formal proff, ie formulas on your theories so i can marvel at its greatness.
thanks
1) Infinity being equivalent to nothing.
If the cosmos = 0
then
0 = all that there is
then
0 = everything
There is a difference in listening to and adapting other views. Where a clear error has been pointed out I immediately acknowledge that but when it is a matter of interpretation or the answer is not directly on point, then I reserve the right to await a concise reply.
Now if I could do that, I think I would take you up on your following comment, since I can't I don't
You have never heard me say that. Indeed if you had looked at my work the first two paragraphs are disclaimers as to any formal mathematicl proof or experimental support. This is something expoused by others as a means of trying to make me look egotistical, which I am not. Hard headed, well maybe.
Actually, I would expect it to be taught should it ever be found to be correct. That however, is not likely to happen at my hand. That is (as I have said before) beyond my skills.
First no forgivness needed. You have been more polite than some
I am sure will become many new ideas on what it really is. So until then it is all tounge in cheek. But soon
I have benn reading some of your posts, speiclally the one called trials of einstien, how you speak of many scientists not beliving his ideas at the start etc,etc, if there isnt some underlying message in what you posted in that thread(related to how people may be thinking of you now, as people saw einstien initially) i would say you would be lying.
The idea of our origin or existance is a paradox.
Science holds a view that something cannot come from nothing.
That energy cannot be created nor destroyed but can only change forms.
That view creates its own paradox. I think we have a tendancy to over dramatize the unknown and immediately branch off to unsupported conclusions.
**********
The conventional view is that "coming into existence" from "nothing", or passing "out of existence" back into "nothing", clearly requires magic, a miracle, or a supernatural act of a God.
That is a logical impossibility by definition of "nothing", meaning non-existence or the total absence of forms at any scale.
Or that "Something" was never created from "Nothing" because it has always existed.
**********
My personal view and that imposed on UniKEF is purely mathematical:
0 = (+1)+(-1)
This is actually a beautiful and profound mathematical expression for creation.
When accepted at face value it says many things.
Not that we can understand it yet.
1 - "0" is infitesimal.
2 - It is a mathematical foundation for our "Existance" coming from "Nothing" which does not invoke magic, miracles or Gods.
3 - The recipocal of infitesimal is infinity but until "All" of "Nothing" becomes "Someting", "Nothing" will ever be physically "Infinite".
Taken as an unknown and perhaps unknowable it has a comfortable feel.
In UniKEF I propose a form of mobius where "0" and "Infinity" are one and the same and that White Holes are Black Holes. It is a place where non-existance and creation and time achieve a triple point.
It is the Chiral Condensate, the "Vacuum or Void" of "Empty" space.
You want proof. Got none. But my view is mathematically supportable. That is one up on magic, miracles, Gods or Physical Infinity.
And now there is scientific evidence that particle pairs pop into and out of existance
This is why the Aether Wave Theory (AWT) considers, the nothing is in fact the artifact of something. In dense particle system no energy can propagate at distance due the chaotic nature of such system, yet such system can condense into something in predictable way....Science holds a view that something cannot come from nothing...
The idea of our origin or existance is a paradox.
Science holds a view that something cannot come from nothing.
That energy cannot be created nor destroyed but can only change forms.
That view creates its own paradox. I think we have a tendancy to over dramatize the unknown and immediately branch off to unsupported conclusions.
**********
The conventional view is that "coming into existence" from "nothing", or passing "out of existence" back into "nothing", clearly requires magic, a miracle, or a supernatural act of a God.
That is a logical impossibility by definition of "nothing", meaning non-existence or the total absence of forms at any scale.
Or that "Something" was never created from "Nothing" because it has always existed.
**********
My personal view and that imposed on UniKEF is purely mathematical:
0 = (+1)+(-1)
This is actually a beautiful and profound mathematical expression for creation.
When accepted at face value it says many things.
Not that we can understand it yet.
1 - "0" is infitesimal.
2 - It is a mathematical foundation for our "Existance" coming from "Nothing" which does not invoke magic, miracles or Gods.
3 - The recipocal of infitesimal is infinity but until "All" of "Nothing" becomes "Someting", "Nothing" will ever be physically "Infinite".
Taken as an unknown and perhaps unknowable it has a comfortable feel.
In UniKEF I propose a form of mobius where "0" and "Infinity" are one and the same and that White Holes are Black Holes. It is a place where non-existance and creation and time achieve a triple point.
It is the Chiral Condensate, the "Vacuum or Void" of "Empty" space.
You want proof. Got none. But my view is mathematically supportable. That is one up on magic, miracles, Gods or Physical Infinity.
And now there is scientific evidence that particle pairs pop into and out of existance
Our minds can remember and learn from the past.
And that is what we call time.
We know from past expirence that it takes an average acorn , time , to grow into a tree.
What it depence on is : (a)potential and
(b)circumstances.
If a+b=1 Then
a+(b/1000)=0,001
Everything is binary, either something happens or it don´t.
1 it happens, 0 it don´t.