The idea of our origin or existance is a paradox.
Science holds a view that something cannot come from nothing.
That energy cannot be created nor destroyed but can only change forms.
That view creates its own paradox. I think we have a tendancy to over dramatize the unknown and immediately branch off to unsupported conclusions.
**********
The conventional view is that "coming into existence" from "nothing", or passing "out of existence" back into "nothing", clearly requires magic, a miracle, or a supernatural act of a God.
That is a logical impossibility by definition of "nothing", meaning non-existence or the total absence of forms at any scale.
Or that "Something" was never created from "Nothing" because it has always existed.
**********
My personal view and that imposed on UniKEF is purely mathematical:
0 = (+1)+(-1)
This is actually a beautiful and profound mathematical expression for creation.
When accepted at face value it says many things.
Not that we can understand it yet.
1 - "0" is infitesimal.
2 - It is a mathematical foundation for our "Existance" coming from "Nothing" which does not invoke magic, miracles or Gods.
3 - The recipocal of infitesimal is infinity but until "All" of "Nothing" becomes "Someting", "Nothing" will ever be physically "Infinite".
Taken as an unknown and perhaps unknowable it has a comfortable feel.
In UniKEF I propose a form of mobius where "0" and "Infinity" are one and the same and that White Holes are Black Holes. It is a place where non-existance and creation and time achieve a triple point.
It is the Chiral Condensate, the "Vacuum or Void" of "Empty" space.
You want proof. Got none. But my view is mathematically supportable. That is one up on magic, miracles, Gods or Physical Infinity.
And now there is scientific evidence that particle pairs pop into and out of existance
Science holds a view that something cannot come from nothing.
That energy cannot be created nor destroyed but can only change forms.
That view creates its own paradox. I think we have a tendancy to over dramatize the unknown and immediately branch off to unsupported conclusions.
**********
The conventional view is that "coming into existence" from "nothing", or passing "out of existence" back into "nothing", clearly requires magic, a miracle, or a supernatural act of a God.
That is a logical impossibility by definition of "nothing", meaning non-existence or the total absence of forms at any scale.
Or that "Something" was never created from "Nothing" because it has always existed.
**********
My personal view and that imposed on UniKEF is purely mathematical:
0 = (+1)+(-1)
This is actually a beautiful and profound mathematical expression for creation.
When accepted at face value it says many things.
Not that we can understand it yet.
1 - "0" is infitesimal.
2 - It is a mathematical foundation for our "Existance" coming from "Nothing" which does not invoke magic, miracles or Gods.
3 - The recipocal of infitesimal is infinity but until "All" of "Nothing" becomes "Someting", "Nothing" will ever be physically "Infinite".
Taken as an unknown and perhaps unknowable it has a comfortable feel.
In UniKEF I propose a form of mobius where "0" and "Infinity" are one and the same and that White Holes are Black Holes. It is a place where non-existance and creation and time achieve a triple point.
It is the Chiral Condensate, the "Vacuum or Void" of "Empty" space.
You want proof. Got none. But my view is mathematically supportable. That is one up on magic, miracles, Gods or Physical Infinity.
And now there is scientific evidence that particle pairs pop into and out of existance
Last edited: