We should all know, that we are here for a reason and a purpose, because as many of us have come to realize, there wouldn’t be anything without a purpose. They are complimentary, to the sense that we cannot deny that we have a place in this arena of spacetime, and without this place and purpose in this place, we would not exist.
Consider what I reflected on earlier… (From another post a while back)
‘’The equations could allow us, to measure the total time for a mind to adjust at normal rate. They can also help explain, Two-Time Measurements, a hypothesis made by physicists (ADD), where it compliments the predictions of the Transactional Interpretation, and faster-then-light communication. It may also be possible to vigorously experiment on he probability curves over a considerable amount of time, to see if there is a type of distinguishable pattern in conscious realm of self-projection. If the result confirmed there was some kind of order in the universe, this would also back up quantum mechanics claims that somehow everything we come to do, say or write, is in fact written in spacetime, where thoughts and memory exist beyond matter and energy, but not the spacetime fabric itself. ‘’
Now, ignoring most of what is said here, and just focus on two-time measurements, we find that you can violate the Uncertainty Principle, if complimentary observables are made specifically in the past and then the future, so it is a curious outcome that physics seems to predict to be able to know the path and location of a particle in present time..!!!
We already know, that somehow everything we come to do and say and write, is already stored in the vacuum, according to relativity. This certainly indicates that everything has to be predetermined to some extent, and any uncertainty, must arise with our inability to process all information based upon a measurement strictly and only in the present.
But this is where it really gets strange, if you haven’t found this strange already. There are oxymoronic cases found in determinism, pre-determinism, uncertainty… According to current belief-structure, is that a ‘’thing’’ at the quantized level can sporadically comes into existence, apparently from nothing. There MUST, and I emphasize this word for sake of being thorough, ‘’must’’ be wrong. I mean, the notion itself sounds ludicrous, to say the least. The very least.
It wasn’t until the foundation of the new physics of the Uncertainty Principle in 1926, making relativity classical and even more incomplete than it was before, we now find that something really can’t come from nothing. Put very simply, the uncertainty principle not only forbids our ability to know everything whilst in the present frame, it also means there is always some factor of uncertainty about key factors at any given place in spacetime, and this also includes energy…
And this violates the energy conservation, a cornerstone principle of physics, or at least, breaks it for a short period of time. But not only this should we consider right now, but we should also take into account that spacetime has an energy, or at least, we think it does, and the new physics of quantum Aether gives an explanation to how something really doesn’t come from nothing at all… a thing does in fact come from some kind of all-pervasive filling potential field of negative energy: But some may disagree, by saying potential is actually nothing. That’s difficult to say, because essentially, everything is potential before any measurement is made in Copenhagen.
If everything is predetermined, then two-time measurements may be the only way to unify some kind of understanding into how a particle can even exist at all. There might be an intelligence, a superintelligence perhaps, that allows something physical like a fluctuation in spacetime to become ‘’real’’ (whatever that may mean), by some kind of two-time measurement process. Putting it crudely, the past and the future sandwich the present, and makes the present what it is, adding specific details that even allows a single particle to ‘’pop’’ into existence.
Consider what I reflected on earlier… (From another post a while back)
‘’The equations could allow us, to measure the total time for a mind to adjust at normal rate. They can also help explain, Two-Time Measurements, a hypothesis made by physicists (ADD), where it compliments the predictions of the Transactional Interpretation, and faster-then-light communication. It may also be possible to vigorously experiment on he probability curves over a considerable amount of time, to see if there is a type of distinguishable pattern in conscious realm of self-projection. If the result confirmed there was some kind of order in the universe, this would also back up quantum mechanics claims that somehow everything we come to do, say or write, is in fact written in spacetime, where thoughts and memory exist beyond matter and energy, but not the spacetime fabric itself. ‘’
Now, ignoring most of what is said here, and just focus on two-time measurements, we find that you can violate the Uncertainty Principle, if complimentary observables are made specifically in the past and then the future, so it is a curious outcome that physics seems to predict to be able to know the path and location of a particle in present time..!!!
We already know, that somehow everything we come to do and say and write, is already stored in the vacuum, according to relativity. This certainly indicates that everything has to be predetermined to some extent, and any uncertainty, must arise with our inability to process all information based upon a measurement strictly and only in the present.
But this is where it really gets strange, if you haven’t found this strange already. There are oxymoronic cases found in determinism, pre-determinism, uncertainty… According to current belief-structure, is that a ‘’thing’’ at the quantized level can sporadically comes into existence, apparently from nothing. There MUST, and I emphasize this word for sake of being thorough, ‘’must’’ be wrong. I mean, the notion itself sounds ludicrous, to say the least. The very least.
It wasn’t until the foundation of the new physics of the Uncertainty Principle in 1926, making relativity classical and even more incomplete than it was before, we now find that something really can’t come from nothing. Put very simply, the uncertainty principle not only forbids our ability to know everything whilst in the present frame, it also means there is always some factor of uncertainty about key factors at any given place in spacetime, and this also includes energy…
And this violates the energy conservation, a cornerstone principle of physics, or at least, breaks it for a short period of time. But not only this should we consider right now, but we should also take into account that spacetime has an energy, or at least, we think it does, and the new physics of quantum Aether gives an explanation to how something really doesn’t come from nothing at all… a thing does in fact come from some kind of all-pervasive filling potential field of negative energy: But some may disagree, by saying potential is actually nothing. That’s difficult to say, because essentially, everything is potential before any measurement is made in Copenhagen.
If everything is predetermined, then two-time measurements may be the only way to unify some kind of understanding into how a particle can even exist at all. There might be an intelligence, a superintelligence perhaps, that allows something physical like a fluctuation in spacetime to become ‘’real’’ (whatever that may mean), by some kind of two-time measurement process. Putting it crudely, the past and the future sandwich the present, and makes the present what it is, adding specific details that even allows a single particle to ‘’pop’’ into existence.
