On Nothing in a void.

Yes, yes yes river you tell me that every time you decide to post some nonsense...We know all about you and your crazy way out hypotheticals on living rock, giants, bigfoot, Probing Aliens and ghosts.....a shame though river, all of it is nothing but pseudoscience.:rolleyes:

Abiogenisis experiments will prove my point , about life being in everything .

Can't wait for the results , are you as excited as me pad for the results of life ?
 
The why are you posting it? You cannot quantify, or state it's being, as I am also attempting to do now. It does not exist.
 
Abiogenisis experiments will prove my point , about life being in everything .

Can't wait for the results , are you as excited as me pad for the results of life ?
The only point that will be upheld is abiogenisis, or life from non life.
Again, a rock is not life, never has been and never will be. ;)
 
The why are you posting it? You cannot quantify, or state it's being, as I am also attempting to do now. It does not exist.
Who?

What?

Why?

Where?

How?

Clear enough?

:)
:DMakes as much sense as the following......
Flying saucers? Where from? Earth is the first inhabited planet in the universe. It's ONLY two-thousands-and-seventeen. We may one day build spaceships and inhabit other planets, only for future beings to fly through the air backwards, again, as their ancestors did, and pass through the fire that is the Sun to visit the almighty through the family tree that is us, but as of yet this is undocumented...
 
River, you can only consider something as living once it possess one of the eight characteristics of life.

https://prezi.com/7vjidooyavqs/biology-the-8-characteristics-of-life/

If it does possess these then it is not considered living; a rock is not considered living because it is missing one or many of these characteristics as with all other non-living objects.

It nothing to do with a substance or being of life that gives life but only when these characteristics can be met, nothing more.
 
Yes pad , nothing worse than an old fool who thinks that his way of understanding the Universe is the only one .
Except another fool, who inevitable believes in total pseudoscience [even after extended holiday] and wears it like a badge of honour! ;)
 
Hello, third time posting something on the forum and am enjoying the conversation. Suck a chode river and give a coherent scientific argument.
 
Yes pad , nothing worse than an old fool who thinks that his way of understanding the Universe is the only one .

Disagree.

Any aged fool who dismisses views of the real world based on observations and evidence and then goes off with unsubstituted thought bubble claims is far far worse.

And you are substantially incorrect in thinking those who don't hold thought bubble claims, as being correct, hold only one other view.

I hold at least 10 views of how the Universe began.

Every night before I go to bed I make it routine to read up the latest views and research.

I then pick my number one which I feel fits the best explanation.

Then I go to bed to dream about my pick.

:)
 
Abiogenisis experiments will prove my point , about life being in everything .

Can't wait for the results , are you as excited as me pad for the results of life ?

Screen%20Shot%202017-01-02%20at%202.34.46%20PM.jpg
 
Hello, third time posting something on the forum and am enjoying the conversation. Suck a chode river and give a coherent scientific argument.
river and coherent scientific argument are totally incompatible I'm afraid....This is the same river who in another current thread is having trouble defining what an orbit is, claims we have had Alien Nuclear wars on Mars, and in another thread, swore black and blue that distant galaxies are "moving" away from us at >c as opposed to spacetime expanding. :D
 
river and coherent scientific argument are totally incompatible I'm afraid....This is the same river who in another current thread is having trouble defining what an orbit is, claims we have had Alien Nuclear wars on Mars, and in another thread, swore black and blue that distant galaxies are "moving" away from us at >c as opposed to spacetime expanding. :D

The ship is sinking, I repeat the ship is sinking.

The Logic ship I mean. ;)
 
Except another fool, who inevitable believes in total pseudoscience [even after extended holiday] and wears it like a badge of honour! ;)

Your much more pithy than me.

Humpty Dumpty is jealous.
So is Poe.
Susan is being lazy in the corner.

Why are you still up young lady. Go to bed now.

:)
 
The ship is sinking, I repeat the ship is sinking.

The Logic ship I mean. ;)

I was going to say if you are posting about The Titanic your to late.

But when I pressed the reply button Logic ship appeared.

So I won't bother.

Is the Logic ship the one where Spock is the Captain?

Make it so Humpty Dumpty.
Poe wants to go Warp 9
:)
 
River, you can only consider something as living once it possess one of the eight characteristics of life.

https://prezi.com/7vjidooyavqs/biology-the-8-characteristics-of-life/

If it does possess these then it is not considered living; a rock is not considered living because it is missing one or many of these characteristics as with all other non-living objects.

It nothing to do with a substance or being of life that gives life but only when these characteristics can be met, nothing more.

I was of the opinion that iron was not alive but became alive when it was incorporated into the life process in the form of hemoglobin.

I was totally wrong and it was explained to me why.

I do find it strange that my life depends on a non living substance.

But it works so I am not going to argue.

:)
 
I was of the opinion that iron was not alive but became alive when it was incorporated into the life process in the form of hemoglobin.

I was totally wrong and it was explained to me why.

I do find it strange that my life depends on a non living substance.

But it works so I am not going to argue.

:)
Oxygen is not alive.
 
Back
Top