The basic idea of scientific medicine is that diseases have causes, internal or external, and to treat a disease, it is preferably to
remove the cause. [The cause has absolutely nothing to do with the case once the disease process has been initiated. If the causative agent remains to be a disease-sustaining agent, it is to be removed as such, but removing the cause has absolutely nothing to do with curing, period! That is precisely why you quacks can only handle bacterial disease. You are total quacks! and you're vile killers who should be executed en masse to stop the mass murder. Fortunately, Karmic Laws permit us to wait patiently till the courts are composed of other than fools more ignorant than allopaths.] In cases where the cause cannot be removed, either
because it is unknown or because no regimen exists, scientific medicine
will attempt to alleviate symptoms.
[Attempt away, but you always only kill your patients while we cure, and that's the fact you will never be able to escape, you vile quack!] I have a number of difficulties with the Homeopathic theory [and you do not know ANYTHING accurate about it, so spit in the wind, fool! Same effect] :
1) What is the purpose of this "disease management center"? It seems
only to make us ill. If it is the cause of all our illnesses, why
wasn't it eliminated by evolution?
[Tim, you're on with this ignorant and dangeous fool.]
2) How can one be shure that the correct symptoms are used for selecting
medicine, humans are notoriously inaccurate at reporting symptoms?
[Well, read the ORGANON, fool! Of course, I have said that repeatedly, though, haven't I?]
3) What is the supposed mechanism for the ability of the medicine to
"remember" the active ingredient, and how is this mechanism able to
know which ingredient to "remember", after all, any sample of water
has been in contact with countless substances?
[We don't know, but it is irrelevant since it obviously happens, but you would know that if you weren't so ignorant, right?]
4) I do not understand why Homeopathy is claimed to be untestable. It
is claimed to have a nobjective effect, and if this is the case, then
it must be testable.
[I therefore repeat, you are ignorant! We treat patients based upon their uncommon symptoms, NOT upon their common symptoms per disease-diagnostic categories. You are so incredibly brainwashed that you cannot even hear things when they are repeatedly stated and restated. You are a very stupid man to be so brainwashed, and that's a fact.]
In this debate, if we can call it a debate, Hahnemannian has made a
number of claims about Allopathy. I am here assuming that he is mainly
referring to the form of Allopathy that I refer to as scientific
medicine. His main claim is that it is unable to cure anything at all.
This opens a few questions, which I have already posed earlier, but which
have all been ignored. If scientific medicine is worthless than how do
you propose to explain that:
1) It has found the causes of and managed to eradicate or strongly reduce
the incidence of a number of diseases, e. g. Smallpox, Plague, Typhoid
Feever, Diftery, Polio, Tuberculosis, Leprocy, Syphilis.
[Lies! Thomas McKeown proved these lies too. So don't be thinking you can get away with such a blatant lie. Very stupid again.]
2) Where some of the dieases mentioned in #1 are still widespread in some
parts of the World, this invariably coincides with lack of access to
medicines.
[No, absolutely untrue. It coincides with the causes of these diseases:
1. Poor sewage (no pipes out);
2. Unclean water (no pipes in);
3. Poor hygenic measure personally and societally; and
4. Poor diets, just as got rid of them in the rest, just Thomas McKeown showed with mortality tables and introduction of vaccines, which did absolutely nothing but make more people sick, and that is a fact, you ignorant man.]
3) A number of diseases cannot (currently) be cured [by allopathy, nothing but bacterial cures can be claimed, which is pitiful and pathetic and abject quackery, dumb man], but in many cases
scientific medicine has succeded to alleviate the symptoms, in some
cases to a degree where patients lead lives that are largely unaffec-
ted by the disease. [But they create diseases that allopaths are perfectly aware of but choose to ignore because it makes them all killers.] Examples: Diabetes [replacement therapy, not a cure and it makes no difference in the longevity of patients, but insulin-dependent patients are guaranteed to die a ghastly horrible convulsive death after a year of dialysis following years of allopathic torture], depression [absurd! allopathic psychiatry manufactures madness], some forms of
epilepsy [and we cure all of them, while they only vacuously claim mild eliviation of "some forms"], several forms of hormone disorders [which you guys of course create, and that is a hollow claim anyway, just like all of the rest].
4) Scientific medicine can be and is tested for efficiacy [because it is based upon erroneous assumptions with which scientific method is abused, e.g., that diseases can be named and that diseases can be prescribed FOR them rather than for patients -- very ignorant].
Instead of your constant attacks on anybody and everybody, it would be
constructive if you would deign to adress some of the questions above [I did but you are obviously too ignorant to hear them, too brainwashed too].
After all, this IS a debate forum [and we came here looking for help, but you are not a scientist and refuse to act like one].
[You are a true waste of space, pal. I would bet money that you are either an allopathic physician or a fool involved in the natural sciences who becomes incredibly stupid by ignoring the 10 Laws of Medicine.]
Hans
